Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;24(6):394-7.
doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.041988.

Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: the Scottish district hospital perspective

A G M Stevenson  1 , C A Graham, R Hall, P Korsah, A C McGuffie
Affiliations

Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: the Scottish district hospital perspective

A G M Stevenson et al. Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Tracheal intubation is the accepted gold standard for emergency department (ED) airway management. It may be performed by both anaesthetists and emergency physicians (EPs), with or without drugs.

Objective: To characterise intubation practice in a busy district general hospital ED in Scotland over 40 months between 2003 and 2006.

Setting: Crosshouse Hospital, a 450-bed district general hospital serving a mixed urban and rural population; annual ED census 58,000 patients.

Methods: Prospective observational study using data collection sheets prepared by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group. Proformas were completed at the time of intubation and checked by investigators. Rapid-sequence induction (RSI) was defined as the co-administration of an induction agent and suxamethonium.

Results: 234 intubations over 40 months, with a mean of 6 per month. EPs attempted 108 intubations (46%). Six patients in cardiac arrest on arrival were intubated without drugs. 29 patients were intubated after a gas induction or non-RSI drug administration. RSI was performed on 199 patients. Patients with trauma constituted 75 (38%) of the RSI group. 29 RSIs (15%) were immediate (required on arrival at the ED) and 154 (77%) were urgent (required within 30 min of arrival at the ED). EPs attempted RSI in 88 (44%) patients and successfully intubated 85 (97%). Anaesthetists attempted RSI in 111 (56%) patients and successfully intubated 108 (97%). Anaesthetists had a higher proportion of good views at first laryngoscopy and there was a trend to a higher rate of successful intubation at the first attempt for anaesthetists. Complication rates were comparable for the two specialties.

Conclusions: Tracheal intubations using RSI in the ED are performed by EPs almost as often as by anaesthetists in this district hospital. Overall success and complication rates are comparable for the two specialties. Laryngoscopy training and the need to achieve intubation at the first (optimum) attempt needs to be emphasised in EP airway training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Nolan J, Clancy M. Airway management in the emergency department. Br J Anaesth 2002889–11. - PubMed
    1. Walker A, Brenchley J. Survey of the use of rapid sequence induction in the accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med 20001795–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sagarin M J, Barton E D, Chng Y M.et al National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators. Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts, Ann Emerg Med 200546328–336. - PubMed
    1. Sakles J C, Laurin E G, Rantapaa A A.et al Airway management in the emergency department: a one‐year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med 199831325–332. - PubMed
    1. Tayal V S, Riggs R W, Marx J A.et al Rapid‐sequence intubation at an emergency medicine registry: success rate and adverse events during a two year period. Acad Emerg Med 1999631–37. - PubMed

MeSH terms