Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 7;274(1620):1853-9.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0297.

Generalization of learned predator recognition: an experimental test and framework for future studies

Affiliations

Generalization of learned predator recognition: an experimental test and framework for future studies

Maud C O Ferrari et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

While some prey species possess an innate recognition of their predators, others require learning to recognize their predators. The specific characteristics of the predators that prey learn and whether prey can generalize this learning to similar predatory threats have been virtually ignored. Here, we investigated whether fathead minnows that learned to chemically recognize a specific predator species as a threat has the ability to generalize their recognition to closely related predators. We found that minnows trained to recognize the odour of a lake trout as a threat (the reference predator) generalized their responses to brook trout (same genus as lake trout) and rainbow trout (same family), but did not generalize to a distantly related predatory pike or non-predatory suckers. We also found that the intensity of antipredator responses to the other species was correlated with the phylogenetic distance to the reference predator; minnows responded with a higher intensity response to brook trout than rainbow trout. This is the first study showing that prey have the ability to exhibit generalization of predator odour recognition. We discuss these results and provide a theoretical framework for future studies of generalization of predator recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change (±s.e.) in (a) shoaling index and (b) line crosses for minnows conditioned with lake trout odour paired with either water (black bars) or conspecific alarm cues (white bars), and tested for a response to either lake trout, brook trout, rainbow trout, pike or sucker.

References

    1. Acquistapace P, Hazlett B.A, Gherardi F. Unsuccessful predation and learning of predator cues by crayfish. J. Crust. Biol. 2003;23:364–370. doi:10.1651/0278-0372(2003)023[0364:UPALOP]2.0.CO;2 - DOI
    1. Berejikian B.A, Tezaka E.P, LaRaeb A.L. Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chinook salmon. Environ. Biol. Fishes. 2003;67:241–251. doi:10.1023/A:1025887015436 - DOI
    1. Bevelhimer M.S, Stein R.A, Carline R.F. Assessing significance of physiological differences among three esocids with a bioenergetics model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1985;42:57–69.
    1. Blumstein D.T. Moving to suburbia: ontogenetic and evolutionary consequences of life on predator-free islands. J. Biogeogr. 2002;29:685–692. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00717.x - DOI
    1. Brown G.E, Chivers D.P, Smith R.J.F. Localized defecation of pike: a response to labelling by cyprinid alarm pheromone? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1995;36:105–110. doi:10.1007/s002650050130 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources