Macroalgal communities face the challenge of changing biotic interactions: review with focus on the Baltic Sea
- PMID: 17520935
- DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[203:mcftco]2.0.co;2
Macroalgal communities face the challenge of changing biotic interactions: review with focus on the Baltic Sea
Abstract
In diverse littoral communities, biotic interactions play an important role in community regulation. This article reviews how eutrophication modifies biotic interactions in littoral macroalgal communities. Eutrophication causes blooms of opportunistic algae, increases epibiotism, and affects regulation by grazers. Opportunistic algae and epibionts harm colonization and growth of perennial algae. Grazing regulates the density and species composition of macroalgal communities, especially at the early stage of algal colonization. Eutrophication supports higher grazer densities by increasing the availability and quality of algae to grazers. This may, on the one hand, enhance the capability of grazers to regulate and counteract the increase of harmful, bloom-forming macroalgae; on the other hand, it may increase grazing pressure on perennial species, with a poor tolerance of grazing. In highly eutrophic conditions, bloom-forming algae may also escape grazing control and accumulate. Increasing epibiotism and grazing threaten in particular the persistence of habitat-forming perennials such as the bladderwrack. An interesting property of biotic interactions is that they do not remain fixed but are able to evolve, as the traits of the interacting species adapt to each other and to abiotic conditions. The potential of plants and grazers to adapt is crucial to their chances to survive in changing environment.
Similar articles
-
Effects of nutrients, herbivory, and depth on the macroalgal community in the rocky sublittoral.Ecology. 2007 Apr;88(4):839-52. doi: 10.1890/05-0144. Ecology. 2007. PMID: 17536701
-
Declines in predatory fish promote bloom-forming macroalgae.Ecol Appl. 2009 Dec;19(8):1975-88. doi: 10.1890/08-0964.1. Ecol Appl. 2009. PMID: 20014572
-
Interactions between planktonic microalgae and protozoan grazers.J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2004 Mar-Apr;51(2):156-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00540.x. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15134250 Review.
-
Algal propagule banks modify competition, consumer and resource control on Baltic rocky shores.Oecologia. 2001 Jul;128(2):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s004420100648. Epub 2001 Jul 1. Oecologia. 2001. PMID: 28547477
-
Algicidal bacteria in the sea and their impact on algal blooms.J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2004 Mar-Apr;51(2):139-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00538.x. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15134248 Review.
Cited by
-
Submersed Aquatic Vegetation Enhances Density and Diversity of Epifaunal Invertebrates Compared to Filamentous Mats in the Central Baltic Sea.Ecol Evol. 2025 May 29;15(6):e71498. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71498. eCollection 2025 Jun. Ecol Evol. 2025. PMID: 40454223 Free PMC article.
-
Spatially variable synergistic effects of disturbance and additional nutrients on kelp recruitment and recovery.Oecologia. 2014 May;175(1):409-16. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2907-9. Epub 2014 Mar 7. Oecologia. 2014. PMID: 24604540