Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;64(10):642-50.
doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.030643. Epub 2007 May 23.

Interventions to prevent back pain and back injury in nurses: a systematic review

Affiliations

Interventions to prevent back pain and back injury in nurses: a systematic review

Anna P Dawson et al. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

A systematic literature review was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of interventions that aim to prevent back pain and back injury in nurses. Ten relevant databases were searched; these were examined and reference lists checked. Two reviewers applied selection criteria, assessed methodological quality and extracted data from trials. A qualitative synthesis of evidence was undertaken and sensitivity analyses performed. Eight randomised controlled trials and eight non-randomised controlled trials met eligibility criteria. Overall, study quality was poor, with only one trial classified as high quality. There was no strong evidence regarding the efficacy of any interventions aiming to prevent back pain and injury in nurses. The review identified moderate level evidence from multiple trials that manual handling training in isolation is not effective and multidimensional interventions are effective in preventing back pain and injury in nurses. Single trials provided moderate evidence that stress management programs do not prevent back pain and limited evidence that lumbar supports are effective in preventing back injury in nurses. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of exercise interventions and the provision of manual handling equipment and training. This review highlights the need for high quality randomised controlled studies to examine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent back pain and injury in nursing populations. Implications for future research are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hofmann F, Stossel U, Michaelis M.et al Low back pain and lumbago‐sciatica in nurses and a reference group of clerks: results of a comparative prevalence study in Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 200275484–490. - PubMed
    1. Cohen‐Mansfield J, Culpepper W J, Carter P. Nursing staff back injuries: prevalence and costs in long term care facilities. AAOHN J 1996449–17. - PubMed
    1. Heliovaara M. Occupation and risk of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. J Chronic Dis 198740259–264. - PubMed
    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics Workplace injuries and illnesses in 2005. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor, 2006, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf (accessed 25 June 2007)
    1. Sherehiy B, Karwowski W, Marek T. Relationship between risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in the nursing profession: a systematic review. Occupational Ergonomics 20044241–279.

Publication types