Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;10(2):148-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00430.x.

Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs

Affiliations

Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs

Greta Friedemann-Sánchez et al. Health Expect. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Context: Several prior studies have found that women are less likely to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) than men. While the source of this screening differential is unknown, recent studies suggest gender differences in barriers to screening might explain the disparity.

Objective: This formative study was designed to explore CRC screening barriers, attitudes and preferences by gender.

Methodology: Focus group interviews with groups stratified by gender and screening status. Participants included 27 females and 43 males between the ages of 50 and 75 years who receive primary care at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. We conducted interpretive and grounded text analysis of semi-structured focus group interviews to assess how knowledge, experiences and sociocultural norms shape female and male preferences and barriers to current CRC screening guidelines.

Results: Female and male participants reported similar preferences for CRC screening mode, but there were notable differences in the barriers and facilitators to screening. Key findings suggest that women viewed the preparation for endoscopic procedures as a major barrier to screening while men did not; women and men expressed different fears and information preferences regarding endoscopic procedures; and women perceive CRC as a male disease thus feeling less vulnerable to CRC. Gender-specific barriers may explain women's lower rate of screening for CRC.

Conclusion: Colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions, decision aids and clinical practice may benefit by being tailored by gender.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures 2003. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2003.
    1. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992; 84: 1572–1575. - PubMed
    1. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS. A case‐control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 1992; 326: 653–657. - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology, 1997; 112: 594–642. - PubMed
    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer S. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003; 53: 27–43. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms