Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;10(2):173-83.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x.

User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts

Affiliations

User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts

Sophie Staniszewska et al. Health Expect. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To involve users in the development of a research bid to examine parents' experiences of having a pre-term baby, and to examine the barriers, enablers and impacts of user involvement.

Design: A mainly collaborative approach to user involvement was adopted, although different types of involvement were evident at different stages of the project. Users' experiences and perspectives provided the focus for the regular meetings which underpinned the writing of the research bid. The researcher acted as a facilitator in the development of the bid, with input from users and the wider advisory group.

Main outcomes: User involvement had an important impact on the development of the research aims, methods and on ethical aspects. Through careful collaboration a research bid was produced which was rooted in users' experiences, whilst also addressing key research questions. Key enablers for involvement included good working relationships, funding for the lead researchers time. Barriers included lack of financial support for users, the time-consuming nature of involvement and the language of research.

Conclusions: If user involvement remains an international policy imperative with little if any support at the vital stage of bid development, policy-makers, service user organizations, researchers, health service providers and commissioners will need to recognize the limited nature of involvement that may result and the impact this would have on the evidence base. Researchers will need to recognize the resource implications of involvement at this point, and user groups will need to decide whether to participate when there is the greatest chance of influencing research but little or no funding.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Institutes of Health . Getting Involved at NIH. Maryland: National Institutes of Health, 2005. Available at: http://getinvolved.nih.gov/public_participation.asp, accessed on 30 November 2005.
    1. Micklethwaite . Implementing the Statement on Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research in Australia. Presentation at Involve Conference; 2004. Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/Abstract.asp?val=30, accessed on 30 November 2005.
    1. Coulter A, McGee H. The European Patient of the Future. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003.
    1. Department of Health . The NHS Plan – A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. London: Department of Health, 2000.
    1. Department of Health . Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London: Department of Health, 1999.