[Requirements and performance profile of the Paediatric Radiation Oncology Working Group (APRO): evaluation of the present situation and description of future developments]
- PMID: 17525911
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973855
[Requirements and performance profile of the Paediatric Radiation Oncology Working Group (APRO): evaluation of the present situation and description of future developments]
Abstract
Background: Radiation therapy is an integral component in the management of childhood malignancies and undergoes a continuous process of optimization within the prospective trials of the GPOH. At present there are approximately 20 active protocols, some specifying radio-oncological study questions, in which about 500 to 600 children annually are given radiotherapy.
Materials/methods: The Pediatric Radiation Oncology Working Group (APRO) of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) represents the organizational link between GPOH and DEGRO. Their activities range from phrasing guidelines of radio-oncological therapy, through writing a protocol for a prospective study on radiation-induced late effects (RISK--in co-operation with GPOH, 695 patients registered so far) and organizing meetings for information transfer, to implementing radio-oncology within the prospective studies of the GPOH by establishing study chairs for radio-oncology when radio-oncological questions are a primary focus and/or to function as a reference institution for quality assurance. These activities also include individual case consultations outside the study proper. Twice annually the members of the APRO meet for an update on current knowledge and future directions where a representative of the GPOH is invited to contribute special aspects of pediatric oncology.
Conclusions: In the future, modern technology (intensity modulated radiotherapy, proton therapy, inclusion of imaging in treatment planning) will be part of disease management in pediatric oncology. A working group for modern radiotherapy technology was established to enhance this development. Prospective studies of the GPOH with primary or secondary radio-oncological questions require the implementation of corresponding tasks (documentation, monitoring, etc.) in order to meet future demands on clinical trials and to achieve the aims of the protocol. Consequently adequate financial support is indispensable.
Similar articles
-
Current and future strategies in radiotherapy of childhood low-grade glioma of the brain. Part II: Treatment-related late toxicity.Strahlenther Onkol. 2003 Sep;179(9):585-97. doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-8104-0. Strahlenther Onkol. 2003. PMID: 14628124 Review.
-
[Register for the evaluation of side effects after radiation in childhood and adolescence--first results].Klin Padiatr. 2007 May-Jun;219(3):139-45. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973848. Klin Padiatr. 2007. PMID: 17525907 German.
-
Stop the pain! A nation-wide quality improvement programme in paediatric oncology pain control.Eur J Pain. 2008 Oct;12(7):819-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 25. Eur J Pain. 2008. PMID: 18222100
-
Pediatric radiation oncology in Germany: a study of availability and application.Klin Padiatr. 2008 May-Jun;220(3):178-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065325. Klin Padiatr. 2008. PMID: 18478491
-
Radiation oncology research in the cancer and leukemia group B.Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jun 1;12(11 Pt 2):3628s-34s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-9011. Clin Cancer Res. 2006. PMID: 16740797 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical