Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jul;47(7):850-9.
doi: 10.1177/0091270007301624. Epub 2007 May 25.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolic acid after enteric-coated mycophenolate versus mycophenolate mofetil in patients with progressive IgA nephritis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolic acid after enteric-coated mycophenolate versus mycophenolate mofetil in patients with progressive IgA nephritis

David Czock et al. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Mycophenolic acid can be administered orally using mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate. In renal transplant patients on immunosuppressant combination therapy, the overall mycophenolic acid exposure after oral dosing with mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate is similar. This study compared pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolic acid after equivalent doses of enteric-coated mycophenolate (360 mg twice daily) or mycophenolate mofetil (500 mg twice daily) in 7 patients with progressive IgA nephritis (glomerular filtration rate 20-35 mL/min) using a randomized crossover design. The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid concentrations and pharmacodynamics (using inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity as a bio-marker) were sequentially monitored for 12 hours. After enteric-coated mycophenolate treatment, the mycophenolic acid peak concentration (Cmax = 12.8 vs 6.0 microg/mL, P < .05) and the overall exposure were significantly higher (AUC = 60.9 vs 40.7 microg.h/mL, P < .05), and the apparent clearance was significantly lower (CL/F = 7.9 vs 10.7 L/h, P < .05) as compared to that after mycophenolate mofetil. Paradoxically, inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity was not significantly different. In conclusion, the steady-state mycophenolic acid exposure was higher during treatment with enteric-coated mycophenolate as compared to mycophenolate mofetil, which might be explained by more extensive enterohepatic recycling of mycophenolic acid after administration of enteric-coated mycophenolate, whereas inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase suppression was not different.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources