Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception
- PMID: 17531612
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.024
Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception
Abstract
The intrauterine device is the most widely used reversible method of contraception in the world today, particularly in developing countries where it is used by 14.5% of women of reproductive age. In the developed world, this percentage is only 7.6%. There are marked regional differences with the highest use in Eastern Asia and the lowest in North America. Such differences between regions and countries can be explained by a number of factors at the individual, service delivery, program and policy levels. The situation in seven countries is briefly described to illustrate this and to conclude that this method of contraception is largely underutilized in many parts of the world, where it could play a significant role in improving women's health.
Similar articles
-
An international comparison of women's occupational health issues in the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Canada, Hong Kong and Singapore: the CIDA-SEAGEP study.Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Oct;55(7):515-22. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi147. Epub 2005 Sep 20. Occup Med (Lond). 2005. PMID: 16174662
-
The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;51(6):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.06.008. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006. PMID: 17081937 Review.
-
Expanding access to intrauterine contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):456.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.027. Epub 2009 Jun 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19527902
-
[Epilepsies: industrialized countries versus developing countries].Soins. 2007 Nov;(720):25-7. Soins. 2007. PMID: 18376739 French. No abstract available.
-
The changing position of IUDs in reproductive health services in developing countries: opportunities and challenges.Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.023. Epub 2007 Mar 23. Contraception. 2007. PMID: 17531614 Review.
Cited by
-
Why did the Japanese Government take so long to approve the intrauterine contraceptive device?Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Oct 16;6:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.09.002. eCollection 2018 Aug. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018. PMID: 30480152 Free PMC article.
-
LARC methods: entering a new age of contraception and reproductive health.Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Feb 23;1:4. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0011-8. eCollection 2016. Contracept Reprod Med. 2016. PMID: 29201394 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
No Association Between Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices and Musculoskeletal Hip Joint Pain.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 20;3(5):e1407-e1412. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.003. eCollection 2021 Oct. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34712979 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of a New Low-Dose Copper and Nitinol Intrauterine Device: Phase 2 Data to 36 Months.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):840-847. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003756. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32168217 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Who is using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods? Findings from nine low-fertility countries.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):149-55. doi: 10.1363/46e1914. Epub 2014 Jul 14. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014. PMID: 25040454 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical