Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;65(7):1007-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.012.

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy of the left side of the colon

Affiliations

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy of the left side of the colon

Simon Cowlam et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) on the left side of the colon is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique, increasingly used to treat lower-GI conditions.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a PEC tube insertion at a single unit.

Design: Retrospective data collection.

Setting: District general and teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.

Patients: Data collected from patients with lower-GI disorders who had a PEC tube inserted.

Interventions: Data collection.

Main outcome measurements: Incidence of complications and patient outcome.

Results: Between 2001 and 2005, 31 patients presented for a PEC. Insertion was possible in 27 patients. Indications included functional constipation (n=8), recurrent sigmoid volvulus (n=8), colonic pseudo-obstruction (n=5), and neurologic constipation (n=6). In 22 patients (81%), symptoms were markedly improved after insertion. Sigmoid volvulus did not recur with a PEC tube in place. The mean (standard error of the mean) duration with tubes in situ was 9.5+/-1.6 months. Only 2 patients still had a PEC tube in situ. A total of 77% of patients had episodes of infection. Infective episodes led to tube removal in 44% of the total group. Other complications included buried internal bolster, fecal leakage, and pain. Mortality was high (26%), with 7 deaths: 5 from unrelated causes and 2 deaths from fecal peritonitis.

Limitations: This was a retrospective study. A prospective study in our unit is unlikely because of these results.

Conclusions: Symptoms were effectively controlled by a PEC tube insertion, and recurrent sigmoid volvulus was prevented. Recurrent complications caused significant morbidity. Infection necessitated tube removal in the majority of patients. Fatal fecal peritonitis occurred in 2 patients. Indiscriminate use of a PEC in the left side of the colon is not recommended. A PEC should only be considered in carefully selected cases.

PubMed Disclaimer