Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jun;31(3):185-95.
doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.03.009.

After shoulder dystocia: managing the subsequent pregnancy and delivery

Affiliations
Review

After shoulder dystocia: managing the subsequent pregnancy and delivery

Edith D Gurewitsch et al. Semin Perinatol. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Among risk factors for shoulder dystocia, a prior history of delivery complicated by shoulder dystocia is the single greatest risk factor for shoulder dystocia occurrence, with odds ratios 7 to 10 times that of the general population. Recurrence rates have been reported to be as high as 16%. Whereas prevention of shoulder dystocia in the general population is neither feasible nor cost-effective, intervention efforts directed at the particular subgroup of women with a prior history of shoulder dystocia can concentrate on potentially modifiable risk factors and individualized management strategies that can minimize recurrence and the associated significant morbidities and mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Postpartum CT Pelvimetry Following Shoulder Dystocia.
CT images were obtained from a grand grand multiparous (para 9) woman immediately following delivery, which was complicated by shoulder dystocia. a) largest transverse diameter; b) anteroposterior diameter (sacral promontory to top of pubic symphysis); image shows marked angulation of sacrococcygeal joint consistent with healed fracture; c) interspinous diameter; d) intertuberous diameter. Acquired pelvic deformity, likely sustained during earlier delivery, probably contributed to “high-riding” anterior shoulder resulting in shoulder dystocia.

Similar articles

References

    1. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:762–8. - PubMed
    1. Benedetti TJ, Gabbe SG. Shoulder dystocia- A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:526–9. - PubMed
    1. Berard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, Subtil D, Vanderstichele S, Monnier JC et al. Fetal macrosomia:risk factors and outcome; a study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 1998;77:51–9. - PubMed
    1. Hassan AA. Shoulder dystocia: Risk factors and prevention. Aust NZ J Obstet Gyn 1988;28:107–9. - PubMed
    1. Nesbitt T, Gilbert W, Herrchen B. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:476–80. - PubMed

Publication types