Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;196(1):201-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.03.038. Epub 2007 May 25.

Structure-function properties of the apoE-dependent COX-2 pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells

Affiliations

Structure-function properties of the apoE-dependent COX-2 pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells

Kamilah Ali et al. Atherosclerosis. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Apolipoprotein (apoE) E is a multifunctional protein that plays a critical role in atherogenesis, in part by regulating the intimal proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Recently, a novel cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 pathway was shown to contribute to the anti-proliferative action of human apoE3 in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Here, we provide insight into the structure-function properties by which apoE mediates these effects. ApoE3 is most effective in promoting COX-2 expression as a lipid-free protein and is less active after lipidation. Alterations in the stability of the helix bundle N-terminal domain of apoE that contains the binding site for the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and heparin do not affect the up-regulation of the COX-2 pathway. In addition, the apoE2, 3, and 4 isoforms are all capable of up-regulating the COX-2 pathway. Finally, the effect of apoE on COX-2 was found to be independent of expression on the VSMC surface of the LDL receptor and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). In summary, our data indicates that apoE, particularly in the lipid-free state, can up-regulate COX-2 in murine vascular smooth muscle cells apparently independently of binding to the LDLR, LRP or HSPG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Influence of apoE3 domain structure on its ability to up-regulate the COX-2 signaling pathway
Quiescent primary murine VSMC were stimulated in 10% HI-FSC media with or without 2 µM of full length apoE3, apoE3-10kDa or apoE3-22kDa domains for 6 or 24 hours. Unstimulated or quiescent cells were maintained in serum-free medium as described in methods A). mRNA fold induction above control levels after 6 hours B–D). Fold-increase of 6-keto PGF, PGE2, and TXB2 production compared to control after 24 hours. The control value of PGF was 15.5±2.0 ng/mL, PGE2 was 0.6±0.2 ng/mL, and TXB2 was 1.2±0.0 ng/mL. All data represents the mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments, statistical significance p< 0.05. * is compared with control.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lipdation of apoE3 reduces its ability to up-regulate the COX-2 pathway
Relative COX-2 mRNA, protein expression levels and eicosanoids production after 6 or 24 hours stimulation of quiescent primary murine VSMC with 2 µM of apoE3 with or without DMPC (2:1 w/w ratio) A). mRNA fold induction above control after 6 hours B). COX-2 protein expression C–D). The fold induction of 6-keto PGF and PGE2 production compared to control after 24 hours. The control value of 6-keto PGF was 3.6±0.7 ng/mL and 1.9±0.5 ng/mL for PGE2. The data represents the mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments except for the COX-2 protein expression, which is the mean from two independent experiments. Statistical significance is a p< 0.05. * is compared with control and # compared with apoE3 without DMPC.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The influence of apoE polymorphism
Quiescent primary murine VSMC were stimulated with 2 µM of apoE isoforms in 10% HI-FCS media for 6 or 24 hours. A). Fold-induction of COX-2 mRNA after 6 hours B). COX-2 protein after 24 hours C–D). Eicosanoids production after 24 hours. The control values were 8.2±2.8 ng/mL of PGF and 0.5±0.2 ng/mL of PGE2. The data in the figures represents the mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments, statistical significance * p< 0.05 as compared to control.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Disruption of LDL receptor binding activity of apoE3
WT VSMC were quiescent for 48 hours followed by stimulation in 10% HI-FCS media supplemented with 2 µM of WT apoE3, 10kDa or 22kDa domains of apoE3, or a quadruple 22kDa apoE3 mutant. A). COX-2 mRNA fold induction after 6 hours stimulation. B–D). COX-2 protein expression and fold-induction of 6-keto PGF and PGE2 production after 24 hours. The control values were 16.4± 5.2 ng/mL of PGF and 0.7 ±0.3 ng/mL of PGE2. The data in the figures represents the mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments, statistical significance p< 0.05. * is significant difference to control.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Effects of disruption of LDLR and HSPG binding of apoE3 on COX-2 signaling pathway
COX-2 mRNA and protein expression as well as eicosanoids production after stimulation of quiescent wild-type or LDLR null VSMC in 10% HI-FCS with and without 2 µM of apoE3 variants. A). COX-2 mRNA fold-induction after 6 hours stimulation in WT VSMC. B.) 24 hours COX-2 protein expression in WT VSMC. C–D). Eicosanoid fold-induction after 24 hours. The control value of 6-keto PGF was 15.5±2.0 ng/mL and PGE2 was 0.6±0.2 ng/mL. E–F). COX-2 mRNA and protein expression in apoE3-stimulated LDLR null VSMC. All data represents the mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments, statistical significance * p< 0.05 as compared to control.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Effects of disruption of LDLR and HSPG binding of apoE3 on COX-2 signaling pathway
COX-2 mRNA and protein expression as well as eicosanoids production after stimulation of quiescent wild-type or LDLR null VSMC in 10% HI-FCS with and without 2 µM of apoE3 variants. A). COX-2 mRNA fold-induction after 6 hours stimulation in WT VSMC. B.) 24 hours COX-2 protein expression in WT VSMC. C–D). Eicosanoid fold-induction after 24 hours. The control value of 6-keto PGF was 15.5±2.0 ng/mL and PGE2 was 0.6±0.2 ng/mL. E–F). COX-2 mRNA and protein expression in apoE3-stimulated LDLR null VSMC. All data represents the mean ± S.E.M of three independent experiments, statistical significance * p< 0.05 as compared to control.

References

    1. Weisgraber KH. Apolipoprotein E: structure-function relationships. Adv. Protein Chem. 1994;45:249–302. - PubMed
    1. Wetterau JR, Aggerbeck LP, Rall SC, Jr, Weisgraber KH. Human apolipoprotein E3 in aqueous solution. I. Evidence for two structural domains. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:6240–6248. - PubMed
    1. Morrow JA, Segall ML, Lund-Katz S, Phillips MC, Knapp M, et al. Differences in Stability among the Human Apolipoprotein E Isoforms Determined by the Amino-Terminal Domain. Biochemistry. 2000;39:11657–11666. - PubMed
    1. Ji ZS, Sanan DA, Mahley RW. Intravenous heparinase inhibits remnant lipoprotein clearance from the plasma and uptake by the liver: in vivo role of heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J. Lipid Res. 1995;36:583–592. - PubMed
    1. Mahley RW. Apolipoprotein E: cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology. Science. 1988;240:622–630. - PubMed

Publication types