Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating
- PMID: 17532499
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.003
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in clinical and radiological outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disease, with and without the addition of an anterior cervical locking plate. Although disc arthoplasty is gaining popularity, the anterior cervical decompression and fusion procedure remains the gold standard. The outcome of 242 cases operated between 1991 to 1998 were analysed. Two groups of patients were operated on by the same surgeon. The only difference in technique between the two groups was the addition of an anterior cervical plate, with all other technical details matching, including the use of iliac crest autograft. The indications for surgery for both groups was identical. We made an attempt to study radiological fusion, clinical outcome and complications between the non-plated and plated groups. Our main finding is that the addition of an anterior plate reduces the number of poor clinical outcomes, but does not increase the number of excellent outcomes. Anterior discectomy and fusion with plating in our series had a significantly higher fusion rate; 98% fusion was noted in the plating group as compared to 93.5% in the non-plating group (Fisher's exact test, p=0.029). Union was faster in the plated group with no significant increase in surgical complications. Although clinical outcomes were superior in the plated group for the radiculopathy cohort, excellent outcomes were not significantly higher as compared to the non-plated group. The non-plated group had a significantly higher rate of poor outcomes, with 10% of patients requiring revision surgery for non-union, kyphosis, graft extrusion and graft collapse with foraminal stenosis. 1.8% of the plated group required revision surgery.
Similar articles
-
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.010. Spine J. 2004. PMID: 15541695
-
Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages.Surg Neurol. 2004 Nov;62(5):378-85, discussion 385-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.021. Surg Neurol. 2004. PMID: 15518835 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates.J Spinal Disord. 1996 Jun;9(3):202-6. J Spinal Disord. 1996. PMID: 8854274
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without instrumentation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):772-4; discussion 775. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000258846.86537.ad. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17414911 Review.
-
[Cervical myelopathy: retrospective analysis of surgical results in 53 cases treated by anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion].Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Jun;16(3):235-55. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005. PMID: 16007323 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparing titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages.Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Nov-Dec;34(6):1412-1417. doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.15833. Pak J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30559795 Free PMC article.
-
Integral Fixation Titanium/Polyetheretherketone Cages for Cervical Arthrodesis: Evolution of Cage Design and Early Radiological Outcomes and Fusion Rates.Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb;11(1):52-59. doi: 10.1111/os.12413. Epub 2019 Jan 6. Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID: 30614216 Free PMC article.
-
A Canadian perspective on anterior cervical discectomies: practice patterns and preferences.J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;4(1):72-78. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.03.01. J Spine Surg. 2018. PMID: 29732425 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19127374 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):975-984. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4914-5. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28004243 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical