Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 May 28;167(10):1076-82.
doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.10.1076.

Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial

Audrey J Weymiller et al. Arch Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Poor quality of information transfer about the benefits and risks of statin drug use may result in patients not making informed decisions that they can act on in a timely fashion.

Methods: The effect of a decision aid about statin drugs on treatment decision making in 98 patients with diabetes was determined in a cluster randomized trial of decision aid vs control pamphlet, with concealed allocation, blinding of participants to study goals, and adherence to the intention-to-treat principle. Twenty-one endocrinologists conducted specialty outpatient metabolic consultations. Patients in the intervention group received Statin Choice, a tailored decision aid that presents the estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk, the absolute risk reduction with use of statin drugs, and the disadvantages of using statin drugs. Patients in the control group received the institution's pamphlet about cholesterol management. We measured acceptability, knowledge about options and cardiovascular risk, and decisional conflict immediately after the visit, and adherence to pill taking was measured 3 months later.

Results: Patients favored using the decision aid (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-6.9); patients who received the decision aid (n = 52) knew more (difference, 2.4 of 9 points; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3), had better estimated cardiovascular risk (OR, 22.4; 95% CI, 5.9-85.6) and potential absolute risk reduction with statin drugs (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.2-19.7), and had less decisional conflict (difference, -10.6; 95% CI, -15.4 to -5.9 on a 100-point scale) than did patients in the control group (n = 46). Of 33 patients in the intervention group taking statin drugs at 3 months, 2 reported missing 1 dose or more in the last week compared with 6 of 29 patients in the control group taking statin drugs (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.5-7.5).

Conclusions: A decision aid enhanced decision making about statin drugs and may have favorably affected drug adherence.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00217061.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Estimating cardiovascular risk.
    Seidel BM, Stocks N. Seidel BM, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 14;168(1):111; author reply 111. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.18. Arch Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18195208 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

Associated data