Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 May 25;7(2):96-100.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i2.2203.

Extracranial doses in stereotactic and conventional radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Extracranial doses in stereotactic and conventional radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

Thomas Samuel Ram et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the extracranial dose in patients treated for pituitary adenoma with conventional and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Twelve patients receiving treatment with radiation for pituitary adenoma were selected. Six patients underwent SRT, and six patients underwent conventional radiotherapy. Extracranial doses were measured with pre-irradiation annealed lithium fluoride thermoluminscent dosimetry (TLD) chips. The chips were wrapped and placed on the patients' skin, over each eyelid, the thyroid, chest, and scrotum for males and over the suprapubic region for females. Postradiation annealing was done, and the TLDs were read in a TLD reader system. The results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test by SPSS, version 6.01. The doses to the thyroid, center, and gonads were significantly higher (74.62 +/- 9.12 mrad, 65.42 +/- 9.35 mrad, and 58.42 +/- 5.36 mrad, respectively) in patients receiving SRT than in conventional radiotherapy portals (69.45 +/- 21.19 mrad, 38.33 +/- 19.44 mrad, and 31.41 +/- 18.25 mrad). But the average doses to the right eye (84.84 +/- 8.80 mrad) and to the left eye (85.68 +/- 5.82 mrad) in the stereotactic group were less when compared with the patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, who received 127.5 +/- 37.90 mrad and 117.29 +/- 34.01 mrad, respectively. In conclusion, SRT is definitely superior to conventional radiotherapy as far as dose to the surrounding normal structures is concerned. The higher extracranial doses in SRT seem to be within the acceptable range; however, the clinical significance of this is still unclear and needs longer followup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gill‐Thomas‐Cosman frame used for stereotactic radiotherapy

References

    1. Kernohan JW, Sayre GP. Tumors of pituitary gland and infundibulum. Section X, fascicle 26, p. 7 Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1956, as quoted in Grisby PW. Pituitary. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott; 1997: 829.
    1. The stereotactic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand. 1951;Jan 15;102:316–319. Leksell, L. , 1951. As quoted in Werner‐Wasik M, Rudoler S, Preston PE, et al. Immediate side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43(2):299–304. - PubMed
    1. Grisby PW. Pituitary. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott; 1997: 387.
    1. Colin P, Jovenin N, Delemer B, et al. Treatment of pituitary adenomas by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: A prospective study of 110 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;Jun 1;62(2):333–341. - PubMed
    1. Sheehan JP, Niranjan A, Sheehan JM, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: An intermediate review of its safety, efficacy, and role in the neurosurgical treatment armamentarium. J Neurosurg. 2005;Apr 102(4):678–691. Review. - PubMed

Publication types