Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;22(8):1195-205.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0231-3. Epub 2007 May 30.

Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions

Affiliations
Review

Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions

Carrie N Klabunde et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been supported by strong research evidence and recommended in clinical practice guidelines for more than a decade. Yet screening rates in the United States remain low, especially relative to other preventable diseases such as breast and cervical cancer. To understand the reasons, the National Cancer Institute and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality sponsored a review of CRC screening implementation in primary care and a program of research funded by these organizations. The evidence base for improving CRC screening supports the value of a New Model of Primary Care Delivery: 1. a team approach, in which responsibility for screening tasks is shared among other members of the practice, would help address physicians' lack of time for preventive care; 2. information systems can identify eligible patients and remind them when screening is due; 3. involving patients in decisions about their own care may enhance screening participation; 4. monitoring practice performance, supported by information systems, can help target patients at increased risk because of family history or social disadvantage; 5. reimbursement for services outside the traditional provider-patient encounter, such as telephone and e-mail contacts, may foster enhanced screening delivery; 6. training opportunities in communication, cultural competence, and use of information technologies would improve provider competence in core elements of screening programs. Improvement in CRC screening rates largely depends on the efforts of primary care practices to implement effective systems and procedures for screening delivery. Active engagement and support of practices are essential for the enormous potential of CRC screening to be realized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Recent use of cancer screening tests from the 1987, 1992, 2000, and 2003 National Health Interview Surveys. Percentages are standardized to the 2000 projected U.S. population by 5-year age groups. Recent Pap smear is measured within the last 3 years for ages 25+. Recent mammogram is measured within the last 2 years for ages 40+. Recent colorectal endoscopy (CRE) is measured within the last 3 years for ages 50+. Recent fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is measured within the last year for ages 50+. Recent prostate specific antigen testing (PSA) is measured within the last year for ages 50+.

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.289.10.1288', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.10.1288'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12633191', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12633191/'}]}
    2. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289:1288–96. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11814067', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11814067/'}]}
    2. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12118971', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12118971/'}]}
    2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1053/gast.2003.50044', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50044'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12557158', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12557158/'}]}
    2. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-updated based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC116324', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC116324/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8930856', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8930856/'}]}
    2. Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3:399–409. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms