Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Oct;30(10):2453-7.
doi: 10.2337/dc06-2003. Epub 2007 May 29.

Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program

William H Herman et al. Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to examine racial and ethnic differences in A1C in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

Research design and methods: We studied 3,819 individuals aged > or = 25 years with IGT who were found to be eligible to participant in the Diabetes Prevention Program. A1C was compared among five racial and ethnic groups before and after adjustment for factors that differed among groups or might affect glycemia including age, sex, education, marital status, blood pressure, adiposity (BMI and waist circumference), hematocrit, fasting and post-glucose load glucose levels, glucose area under the curve (AUC), beta-cell function, and insulin resistance.

Results: Mean +/- SD A1C was 5.91 +/- 0.50%. Among whites, A1C was 5.80 +/- 0.44%, among Hispanics 5.89 +/- 0.46%, among Asian 5.96 +/- 0.45%, among American Indians 5.96 +/- 0.46%, and among blacks 6.19 +/- 0.59%. Age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI, fasting glucose, glucose AUC, corrected insulin response, and insulin resistance were each independent predictors of A1C. Adjusting for these and other factors, mean A1C levels were 5.78% for whites, 5.93% for Hispanics, 6.00% for Asians, 6.12% for American Indians, and 6.18% for blacks (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: A1C levels are higher among U.S. racial and ethnic minority groups with IGT after adjustment for factors likely to affect glycemia. Among patients with IGT, A1C may not be valid for assessing and comparing glycemic control across racial and ethnic groups or as an indicator of health care disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • A1C: does one size fit all?
    Cohen RM. Cohen RM. Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2756-8. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1301. Diabetes Care. 2007. PMID: 17901536 No abstract available.

References

    1. Nathan DM, Singer DE, Hurxthal K, Goodson JD. The clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:341–346. - PubMed
    1. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, England JD, McKenzie EM. Glycated hemoglobin: methodologies and clinical applications. Clin Chem. 1986;32 10:B64–B70. - PubMed
    1. Kirk JK, Bell RA, Bertoni AG, Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Goff DC, Narayan KMV. Ethnic disparities: control of glycemia, blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol among US adults with type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:1489–1501. - PubMed
    1. Summerson JH, Konen JC, Dignan MB. Race-related differences in metabolic control among adults with diabetes. South Med J. 1992;85:953–956. - PubMed
    1. Wisdom K, Fryzek JP, Havstad SL, Anderson RM, Dreiling MC, Tilley BC. Comparison of laboratory test frequency and test results between African-Americans and whites with diabetes: opportunity for improvement: findings from a large urban health maintenance organization. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:971–977. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances