Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Dec;91(12):1639-43.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.119628. Epub 2007 May 30.

The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma

A Azuara-Blanco  1 , J Burr, R Thomas, G Maclennan, S McPherson
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma

A Azuara-Blanco et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the diagnostic performance of accredited glaucoma optometrists (AGO) for both the diagnosis of glaucoma and the decision to treat with that of routine hospital eye care, against a reference standard of expert opinion (a consultant ophthalmologist with a special interest in glaucoma).

Methods: A directly comparative, masked, performance study was undertaken in Grampian, Scotland. Of 165 people invited to participate, 100 (61%) were examined. People suspected of having glaucoma underwent, within one month, a full ophthalmic assessment in both a newly established community optometry led glaucoma management scheme and a consultant led hospital eye service.

Results: Agreement between the AGO and the consultant ophthalmologist in diagnosing glaucoma was substantial (89%; kappa = 0.703, SE = 0.083). Agreement over the need for treatment was also substantial (88%; kappa = 0.716, SE = 0.076). The agreement between the trainee ophthalmologists and the consultant ophthalmologist in the diagnosis of glaucoma and treatment recommendation was moderate (83%, kappa = 0.541, SE = 0.098, SE = 0.98; and 81%, kappa = 0.553, SE = 0.90, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of the optometrists in detecting glaucoma in this population was high for specificity (0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 0.97)) but lower for sensitivity (0.76 (0.57 to 0.89)). Performance was similar when accuracy was assessed for treatment recommendation (sensitivity 0.73 (0.57 to 0.85); specificity 0.96 (0.88 to 0.99)). The differences in sensitivity and specificity between AGO and junior ophthalmologist were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Community optometrists trained in glaucoma provided satisfactory decisions regarding diagnosis and initiation of treatment for glaucoma. With such additional training in glaucoma, optometrists are at least as accurate as junior ophthalmologists but some cases of glaucoma are missed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Quigley H A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 199680389–393. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burr J, Mowatt G, Siddiqui M A R.et al The clinical and cost effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma. Health Technol Assess. (in press).
    1. Bell R W D, O'Brien C. The diagnostic outcome of new glaucoma referrals. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997173–6. - PubMed
    1. Harrison R J, Wild J M, Hobley A J. Referral patterns to an ophthalmic outpatient clinic by general practitioners and ophthalmic opticians and the role of these professionals in screening for ocular disease. BMJ 19882971162–1167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuck M W. Referrals for suspected glaucoma: an International Glaucoma Association survey. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19911122–26. - PubMed

Publication types