Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;50(3):621-34.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/044).

Effect of cues to increase sound pressure level on respiratory kinematic patterns during connected speech

Affiliations

Effect of cues to increase sound pressure level on respiratory kinematic patterns during connected speech

Jessica E Huber. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the response of the respiratory system to 3 cues used to elicit increased vocal loudness to determine whether the effects of cueing, shown previously in sentence tasks, were present in connected speech tasks and to describe differences among tasks.

Method: Fifteen young men and 15 young women produced a 2-paragraph reading passage in response to 4 different loudness cues: comfortable loudness level, targeting 10 dB above comfortable, at what they perceived as twice their comfortable loudness, and with multitalker noise present in the background. A short monologue was produced at comfortable loudness level and with noise in the background.

Results: Differences in respiratory strategies were demonstrated for the different cueing conditions, similar to patterns observed in sentence productions. The kinematic patterns were similar for reading and monologue; however, utterances were longer and speaking rate was slower in the monologue task.

Conclusion: The findings extend the results from sentences to connected speech and provide support for the hypothesis that "intention" or goals play a role in the control of respiratory function during speech. Respiratory kinematics were similar across tasks, when the same cue was used, except for differences related to breath group length and speech rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sound pressure level in decibels (dB) by task and condition. Symbols with error bars represent means and standard deviations for conditions. Filled symbols represent reading; open symbols represent monologue. Asterisk indicates significantly different from the COMF condition within task. Carrot indicates significantly different from the NOISE condition during reading.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Syllables per second by task and condition. Symbols with error bars represent means and standard deviations for conditions. Filled symbols represent reading; open symbols represent monologue. Asterisk indicates significantly different from the COMF condition within task.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lung Volume Measurements by task and condition. Initiations represented by unfilled symbols; terminations represented by filled symbols; excursions represented by bars (unfilled bars = reading (R), filled bars = monologue (M)). Symbols with error bars represent means and standard deviations. Asterisk indicates significantly different from the COMF condition within task. Values in percent vital capacity (%VC) and relative to end expiratory level.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Abdominal Volume Measurements by task and condition. Initiations represented by unfilled symbols; terminations represented by filled symbols; excursions represented by bars (unfilled bars = reading (R), filled bars = monologue (M)). Symbols with error bars represent means and standard deviations. Asterisk indicates significantly different from the COMF condition within task. Values in percent abdominal capacity (%ABC) and relative to end expiratory level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bode FR, Dosman J, Martin RR, Ghezzo H, Macklem PT. Age and sex differences in lung elasticity, and in closing capacity in nonsmokers. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1976;41:129–135. - PubMed
    1. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat (Version 4.1) Institute of Phonetic Sciences; Amsterdam: 2003.
    1. Dromey C, Ramig LO. Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: Their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 1998;41:1003–1018. - PubMed
    1. Finnegan EM, Luschei ES, Hoffman HT. Modulations in respiratory and laryngeal activity associated with changes in vocal intensity during speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2000;43:934–950. - PubMed
    1. Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M. Language and motor control. Experimental Brain Research. 2000;133:468–490. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources