Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs
- PMID: 17538548
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100258
Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs
Abstract
Robust tools for monitoring the safety of marketed therapeutic products are of paramount importance to public health. In recent years, innovative statistical approaches have been developed to screen large post-marketing safety databases for adverse events (AEs) that occur with disproportionate frequency. These methods, known variously as quantitative signal detection, disproportionality analysis, or safety data mining, facilitate the identification of new safety issues or possible harmful effects of a product. In this article, we describe the statistical concepts behind these methods, as well as their practical application to monitoring the safety of pharmaceutical products using spontaneous AE reports. We also provide examples of how these tools can be used to identify novel drug interactions and demographic risk factors for adverse drug reactions. Challenges, controversies, and frontiers for future research are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Safety monitoring of new anti-malarials in immediate post-marketing phase.Med Trop (Mars). 1998;58(3 Suppl):93-6. Med Trop (Mars). 1998. PMID: 10212911 Review.
-
A primer of drug safety surveillance: an industry perspective. Part III: Managing adverse-event data.J Pharm Technol. 1992 Nov-Dec;8(6):259-73. doi: 10.1177/875512259200800608. J Pharm Technol. 1992. PMID: 10122649 Review.
-
Can Disproportionality Analysis of Post-marketing Case Reports be Used for Comparison of Drug Safety Profiles?Clin Drug Investig. 2017 May;37(5):415-422. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0503-6. Clin Drug Investig. 2017. PMID: 28224371 Review.
-
Postmarketing surveillance of potentially fatal reactions to oncology drugs: potential utility of two signal-detection algorithms.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Dec;60(10):747-50. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0834-0. Epub 2004 Nov 17. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15619136
-
Comparative performance of two quantitative safety signalling methods: implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department.Drug Saf. 2006;29(10):875-87. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629100-00005. Drug Saf. 2006. PMID: 16970511
Cited by
-
The past, present and perhaps future of pharmacovigilance: homage to Folke Sjoqvist.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 May;69 Suppl 1:33-41. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1486-8. Epub 2013 May 3. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23640186
-
Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Int J Med Sci. 2013 Apr 25;10(7):796-803. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6048. Print 2013. Int J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23794943 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular Toxicities of Ibrutinib: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;16(1):98. doi: 10.3390/ph16010098. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36678594 Free PMC article.
-
Propensity score-adjusted three-component mixture model for drug-drug interaction data mining in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Stat Med. 2020 Mar 30;39(7):996-1010. doi: 10.1002/sim.8457. Epub 2019 Dec 27. Stat Med. 2020. PMID: 31880829 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective data mining of six products in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: disposition of events identified and impact on product safety profiles.Drug Saf. 2010 Feb 1;33(2):139-46. doi: 10.2165/11319000-000000000-00000. Drug Saf. 2010. PMID: 20082540
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources