Randomized comparison of dexamethasone-eluting stents with bare metal stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: serial angiographic and sonographic analysis

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the anti-inflammatory effect of the dexamethasone preloaded stent (Dexamet, Abbott, Galway, Ireland) with the bare metal stent (BMS; BiodivYsio, Biocompatibles Cardiovascular LTD, Galway, Ireland) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) assessed by angiographic (QCA) and intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS).

Methods and results: One hundred twenty patients with ACS were randomly assigned to revascularization using the Dexamet stent (n = 60) or BMS (n = 60). Serial QCA analysis and ICUS analysis were performed during long-term follow-up (2.9 F; 20 MHz transducer; Volcano Corp, Brussels, Belgium). Power calculations were performed for QCA-derived differences of lumen loss. In addition, statistical analysis was performed (SPSS for Windows 12.0.1). The target lesion revascularization rate was lower in the Dexamet group (10 [16.67%] vs 20 [33.33%] patients; P = .031). The QCA revealed improved lumen restoration in the Dexamet stent group (lumen loss, 0.55 +/- 0.65 vs 1.07 +/- 0.92 mm [P = .001]; loss index, 0.20 +/- 0.23 vs 0.46 +/- 0.42 [P < .001]). The ICUS revealed greater neointimal proliferation in the BMS versus the Dexamet stent group (3.36 +/- 1.03 vs 3.05 +/- 1.38 mm2; P < .001). Death (n = 1) and the number of total occlusions of the stent segment (n = 1) were identical in both groups.

Conclusion: Dexamet stents, in comparison with the BMS stents, reduced the target lesion revascularization rate in patients with ACS and lead to better lumen restoration during long-term follow-up.