Reducing publication bias through trial registration
- PMID: 17540818
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a
Reducing publication bias through trial registration
Abstract
Publication bias is the systematic, preferential publication of studies with statistically significant positive results over indeterminate studies (frequently, researchers inappropriately term these "negative" studies), or studies that show a statistically significant negative outcome. Over time, this practice distorts the medical literature, potentially compromising the validity of systematic reviews. Publication bias primarily stems from investigators, but data suppression can occur by pharmaceutical companies, universities, and regulatory agencies. Registration at inception of all clinical trials in a centralized, searchable database can reduce publication bias by enabling researchers to identify all studies related to a particular intervention. Prior attempts to encourage voluntary trial registration have been largely unsuccessful. Hence, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors recently adopted a policy of mandatory clinical trial registration before consideration of manuscripts for publication. Trial registration and the development of comprehensive, computerized databases will promote transparency in research and help reduce publication bias.
Similar articles
-
Reducing publication bias of prospective clinical trials through trial registration.Contraception. 2007 Nov;76(5):339-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.013. Contraception. 2007. PMID: 17963856
-
Tackling publication bias and selective reporting in health informatics research: register your eHealth trials in the International eHealth Studies Registry.J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 30;6(3):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e35. J Med Internet Res. 2004. PMID: 15471761 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting, access, and transparency: better infrastructure of clinical trials.Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S178-83. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819207bb. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19104221
-
[A national prospective trial register for randomised controlled trials: ethical and practical necessity].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Sep 18;148(38):1866-9. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004. PMID: 15497780 Review. Dutch.
-
How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Feb;9(1 Suppl):15-21. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997. PMID: 9083596 Review.
Cited by
-
Potential publication bias in chiropractic and spinal manipulation research listed on clinicaltrials.gov.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2020 Apr;64(1):82-87. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32476671 Free PMC article.
-
Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0545-5. Trials. 2015. PMID: 25626862 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36084702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs.Trials. 2009 Dec 16;10:116. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-116. Trials. 2009. PMID: 20015404 Free PMC article.
-
Public disclosure of clinical trial results at Clinical Trial Registry of India- Need for transparency in research!Perspect Clin Res. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):81-85. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_39_22. Epub 2022 Nov 14. Perspect Clin Res. 2023. PMID: 37325584 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources