Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 17540908
- PMCID: PMC1895676
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39217.671019.55
Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effects of two computer based decision aids on decisional conflict and mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous caesarean section.
Design: Randomised trial, conducted from May 2004 to August 2006.
Setting: Four maternity units in south west England, and Scotland.
Participants: 742 pregnant women with one previous lower segment caesarean section and delivery expected at >or=37 weeks. Non-English speakers were excluded.
Interventions: Usual care: standard care given by obstetric and midwifery staff. Information programme: women navigated through descriptions and probabilities of clinical outcomes for mother and baby associated with planned vaginal birth, elective caesarean section, and emergency caesarean section. Decision analysis: mode of delivery was recommended based on utility assessments performed by the woman combined with probabilities of clinical outcomes within a concealed decision tree. Both interventions were delivered via a laptop computer after brief instructions from a researcher.
Main outcome measures: Total score on decisional conflict scale, and mode of delivery.
Results: Women in the information programme (adjusted difference -6.2, 95% confidence interval -8.7 to -3.7) and the decision analysis (-4.0, -6.5 to -1.5) groups had reduced decisional conflict compared with women in the usual care group. The rate of vaginal birth was higher for women in the decision analysis group compared with the usual care group (37% v 30%, adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 0.94 to 2.14), but the rates were similar in the information programme and usual care groups.
Conclusions: Decision aids can help women who have had a previous caesarean section to decide on mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. The decision analysis approach might substantially affect national rates of caesarean section. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84367722.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Decision aids for women with a previous caesarean section.BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1281-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39247.535532.80. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17585120 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal birth after a caesarean is not always beneficial.BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39262.430706.3A. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17615189 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study.BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):896-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02120.x. Epub 2009 Apr 7. BJOG. 2009. PMID: 19385964 Clinical Trial.
-
Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.BJOG. 2006 Dec;113(12):1438-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01112.x. BJOG. 2006. PMID: 17081180
-
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Midwifery. 2017. PMID: 28478374
-
The effectiveness of decision aids for pregnancy related decision-making in women with pre-pregnancy morbidity; systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 29;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04402-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35093017 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for fear of childbirth including tocophobia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;7(7):CD013321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013321.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34231203 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol.BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e046021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046021. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33753445 Free PMC article.
-
Time to consider the risks of caesarean delivery for long term child health.BMJ. 2015 Jun 10;350:h2410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2410. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26063685 Free PMC article.
-
The Ten-Group Robson Classification: A Single Centre Approach Identifying Strategies to Optimise Caesarean Section Rates.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017;2017:5648938. doi: 10.1155/2017/5648938. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017. PMID: 28167965 Free PMC article.
-
A cluster-randomized trial to reduce caesarean delivery rates in Quebec: cost-effectiveness analysis.BMC Med. 2017 May 22;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0859-8. BMC Med. 2017. PMID: 28528578 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient decision aid for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus planned repeat cesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04119-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34556061 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The national sentinel caesarean section audit report London: RCOG Press, 2001
-
- Information Centre for Health and Social Care. NHS maternity statistics, England: 2004-05 London: Information Centre, 2006
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Menacker F, Sutton PD, Matthews TJ. Preliminary births for 2004: infant and maternal health 2006. www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths04/prelimbirths0...
-
- Nassar N, Sullivan E. Australia's mothers and babies 1999 Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2001
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Evaluation of cesarean delivery Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical