Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 May;88(5 Pt 2):741-59.
doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(07)91342-6.

[The diagnosis of recent scaphoid fractures: review of the literature]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Review

[The diagnosis of recent scaphoid fractures: review of the literature]

[Article in French]
A Blum et al. J Radiol. 2007 May.

Abstract

Fractures of the scaphoid are the most common carpal fractures. A review of the literature indicates that the prevalence of the fracture in the case of clinical suspicion is less than 50%. A quality X-ray examination remains essential as an initial diagnostic tool in the evaluation of scaphoid fractures. Its sensitivity varies from 59 to 79%. Patients with negative X-rays present with about 18.7% of scaphoid fractures; 5% of bruised scaphoid; 13% of radius fractures and 7% of miscellaneous bone lesions. If not treated promptly, a scaphoid fracture may be compounded by non-union with associated risk factors such as avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis. Considering these risks, patients with suspected scaphoid fracture with normal X-rays, routinely undergo wrist immobilization until imaging confirms or denies the presence of fracture. Consequently, more than half of the patients undergo wrist immobilization needlessly. This may have a negative impact on their professional life and personal activities while representing a high medical cost. MRI is the imaging technique of choice for suspicious or negatice X-rays. MDCT is less costly than MRI or bone scan, readily available and highly effective for trauma patients but is lacks accuracy and should be used with caution in this indication.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources