Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;25(2):45-52.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-006-0102-6. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

Assessment of setup accuracy in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging

Affiliations

Assessment of setup accuracy in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging

Funda Gul Koseoglu et al. Radiat Med. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the setup accuracy for patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging.

Materials and methods: Ten patients undergoing radiotherapy via tangent (TG), supraclavicular-axillary (SA), and internal mammary (IM) fields were included. To explore the setup accuracy, distances between chosen landmarks were taken as reference parameters (RPs). The difference between measured RPs on simulation films and electronic portal images (EPIs) was calculated as the setup error.

Results: A total of 30 simulation films and 120 EPIs were evaluated. In the SA field, calculated RPs were lung length (LL), clavicle-field center perpendicular distance, and clavicle-field center transverse distance. The mean of the standard deviations (SDs) of the random errors (sigma) for these parameters were 4.7, 7.3, and 7.6; and the SDs of the systematic errors (Sigma) were 6.8, 4.4, and 13.5, respectively. In the TG fields, the calculated RPs were the central lung distance (CLD), maximum lung distance (MLD), and central soft-tissue distance (CSTD). In the medial TG field, the sigma values for these parameters were 3.4, 3.6, and 4.1, respectively; and the sigma values were 6.6, 2.6, and 3.4, respectively. In the lateral TG field, Sigma values for the calculated RPs were 2.4, 3.2, and 3.3l, respectively; and the Sigma values were 5.6, 3.6, and 4.8, respectively.

Conclusion: CLD, MLD, and CSTD in TG fields and LL in SA fields are easily identifiable and are helpful for detecting setup errors using EPIs in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Feb 15;25(3):529-39 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 2;337(14):949-55 - PubMed
    1. Radiother Oncol. 1991 Dec;22(4):317-22 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Dec 1;48(5):1569-74 - PubMed
    1. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):179-83 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources