Male courtship song and female preference variation between phylogeographically distinct populations of Drosophila montana
- PMID: 17542854
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00125.x
Male courtship song and female preference variation between phylogeographically distinct populations of Drosophila montana
Abstract
Understanding the variation within and between populations in important male mating traits and female preferences is crucial to theories concerning the origin of sexual isolation by coevolution or other processes. There have been surprisingly few studies on the extent of variation and covariation within and between populations, especially where the evolutionary relationships between populations are understood. Here we examine variation in female preferences and a sexually selected male song trait, the carrier frequency of the song, within and between populations from different phylogeographic clusters of Drosophila montana. Song is obligatory for successful mating in this species, and both playback and field studies implicate song carrier frequency as the most important parameter in male song. Carrier frequency varied among three recently collected populations from Oulanka (Finland), Vancouver (Canada), and Colorado (central United States), which represent the main phylogeographic groups in D. montana. Males from Colorado had the most distinct song frequency, which did not follow patterns of genetic differentiation. There was considerable variation in preference functions within, and some variation between, populations. Surprisingly, females from three lines from Colorado seem to have preferences disfavoring the extreme male trait found in this population. We discuss sources of selection on male song and female preference.
Similar articles
-
The extent of variation in male song, wing and genital characters among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.J Evol Biol. 2007 Jul;20(4):1591-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01323.x. J Evol Biol. 2007. PMID: 17584251
-
Phylogeographic patterns in Drosophila montana.Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1085-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03215.x. Mol Ecol. 2007. PMID: 17305862
-
The role of male courtship song in species recognition in Drosophila montana.Behav Genet. 2005 May;35(3):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s10519-005-3218-z. Behav Genet. 2005. PMID: 15864441
-
Factors affecting male song evolution in Drosophila montana.Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005;67:225-50. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)67007-X. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005. PMID: 15949536 Review.
-
Behavioral genetics of Drosophila ananassae.Genet Mol Res. 2003 Dec 30;2(4):394-409. Genet Mol Res. 2003. PMID: 15011143 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.Genetics. 2020 Jan;214(1):49-73. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302263. Genetics. 2020. PMID: 31907301 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Mar 14;11:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-68. BMC Evol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21396136 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana.Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;2(1):80-94. doi: 10.1002/ece3.75. Ecol Evol. 2012. PMID: 22408728 Free PMC article.
-
Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Jan;201(1):171-82. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0963-6. Epub 2014 Nov 15. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015. PMID: 25398575 Review.
-
Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.Genetica. 2014 Feb;142(1):23-41. doi: 10.1007/s10709-013-9751-4. Epub 2013 Dec 22. Genetica. 2014. PMID: 24362558 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases