Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study
- PMID: 17544083
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.015
Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study
Abstract
Background: Pancreatectomy is a high-risk, technically demanding operation associated with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to describe the 30-day morbidity and mortality for pancreatectomy and to compare outcomes between private-sector and Veterans Affairs hospitals using multiinstitutional data.
Study design: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent pancreatic resection for neoplasia at private-sector (PS) and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Patient Safety in Surgery Study in fiscal years 2002 to 2004. The variables reviewed were demographics, preoperative medical conditions, intraoperative variables, and outcomes. Using logistic regression to control for differences in patient comorbidities, 30-day mortality and morbidity rates between PS and VA hospitals were compared.
Results: A total of 1,069 patients underwent pancreatectomy for neoplasia at 97 participating hospitals. Six hundred ninety-two patients were treated at PS hospitals and 377 at VA hospitals. The average number of patients treated at each hospital was 11.0, with a range of 1 to 83 during the 3-year study period. There were 842 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPT 4815x) and 227 who underwent distal/subtotal pancreatectomy (CPT 4814x). Significant differences were observed between PS patients and VA patients with regard to comorbidities and patient demographics. The 30-day unadjusted morbidity rate was 33.8% overall, 42.2% at VA hospitals versus 29.1% at PS hospitals (p < 0.0001). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for postoperative morbidity comparing VA with PS hospitals was 1.781 (95% CI, 1.369-2.318) and 1.581 (95% CI, 1.064-2.307). The 30-day unadjusted operative mortality rate was 3.8% overall, 6.4% at VA hospitals and 2.5% at PS hospitals (p = 0.0015). Unadjusted and adjusted OR for postoperative mortality was 2.909 (95% CI, 1.525-5.549) and 2.533 (95% CI, 1.020-6.290), respectively. Similar outcomes were observed when looking at pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPT 4815x) when analyzed independent of other types of pancreatic resections.
Conclusion: Pancreatectomies are high-risk operations with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. Risk-adjusted outcomes for patients treated at PS hospitals were found to be superior to those for patients treated at VA hospitals in the study.
Similar articles
-
Adrenalectomy in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study.J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1273-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.014. J Am Coll Surg. 2007. PMID: 17544085
-
Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: general surgical operations in women.J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.060. J Am Coll Surg. 2007. PMID: 17544071
-
Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: vascular surgical operations in women.J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.059. J Am Coll Surg. 2007. PMID: 17544072
-
[Resective surgical treatment of exocrine pancreas neoplasms. Retrospective study of 294 cases and review of the literature].Ann Ital Chir. 1998 Jan-Feb;69(1):49-62. Ann Ital Chir. 1998. PMID: 11995039 Review. Italian.
-
The role of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in patient care, surgical education, research and faculty development.Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):662-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.001. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16226937 Review.
Cited by
-
Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who?Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffbfb. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 22895395 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Polypropylene mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy for periampullar neoplasm.World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec 7;13(45):6072-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.45.6072. World J Gastroenterol. 2007. PMID: 18023102 Free PMC article.
-
Feeding patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a UK national survey.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jul;91(5):385-8. doi: 10.1308/003588409X428270. Epub 2009 Apr 30. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009. PMID: 19409147 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):105-121. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3775-2. Epub 2016 Jul 15. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 27422615 Free PMC article.
-
The visceral pancreatic neck anterior distance may be an effective parameter to predict post-pancreaticoduodenectomy clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.Heliyon. 2023 Feb 11;9(2):e13660. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13660. eCollection 2023 Feb. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 36865459 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical