Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jun;16(3):203-7.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020776.

Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM

David J Biau  1 , Mathieu Resche-Rigon, Gaëlle Godiris-Petit, Rémy S Nizard, Raphaël Porcher
Affiliations
Review

Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM

David J Biau et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The report of the CUSUM across surgical and interventional procedures has spawned a fair confusion in the literature.

Aim: To assess the use of the CUSUM and to clarify its utilisation in the perspective of future studies. Nature of the study: Retrospective review.

Methods: A systematic literature search of Medline was carried out. From each article, data regarding the design of the study, the specialty, the performance criterion, the unit under control, the methodology and the model of the CUSUM used, the use of a graph, the use of a test and the type of test applied were retrieved.

Results: 31 studies were found relevant. The design was mainly retrospective for the analysis of the learning curve. The main performance criteria under control were morbidity, mortality and success of the procedure. A graph was plotted in all studies as a CUSUM plot or as cumulative sums of non-negative values. A test was used in 17 studies. Mislabelling of the plot and the test, and misuse of control limits were the most commonly reported mistakes.

Conclusion: The CUSUM tool is not yet properly reported in the surgical literature. Therefore, reporting of the CUSUM should be clarified and standardised before its use widens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. The Inquiry into the management of care of children receiving complex heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary http://www.bristol‐inquiry.org.uk/ (accessed 3 Apr 2007)
    1. Institute Of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001 - PubMed
    1. de Leval M R, Francois K, Bull C.et al Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures. Application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107: 914–23; discussion 923–14, - PubMed
    1. Spiegelhalter D, Grigg O, Kinsman R.et al Risk‐adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery. Int J Qual Health Care 2003157–13. - PubMed
    1. Rogers C A, Ganesh J S, Banner N R.et al Cumulative risk adjusted monitoring of 30‐day mortality after cardiothoracic transplantation: UK experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005271022–1029. - PubMed

MeSH terms