Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jun 4:7:95.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-95.

Interventions for increasing chlamydia screening in primary care: a review

Affiliations
Review

Interventions for increasing chlamydia screening in primary care: a review

Samitha Ginige et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Despite guidelines recommending opportunistic chlamydia screening of younger women, screening rates in some countries remain low. Our aim was to review the evidence for specific interventions aimed at increasing chlamydia screening rates in primary care.

Methods: A Medline search was conducted for controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving chlamydia screening rates in primary health care settings. The Medline search was done for studies in English published prior to December 2005 using the following key words: chlamydia, screening, intervention, primary care and GPs. In addition, the references cited in the articles were reviewed. Studies in English published prior to December 2005 were reviewed.

Results: Four controlled studies met the inclusion criteria--3 were randomized studies and one was not. Strategies to increase screening rates included the use of educational packages targeting primary care physicians and the correction of barriers to screening within clinic systems. In 3 studies, the intervention was associated with an increase in screening rates of between 100% and 276% (p < 0.04). In the fourth study, the intervention was associated with a significant attenuation in declining screening rates over time (4% versus 34% decline, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: There are only a limited number of randomized or controlled studies that demonstrate improved chlamydia screening of younger women in primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search method used to identify controlled studies assessing interventions aimed at increasing chlamydia screening in primary care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections: overview and estimates. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
    1. Sutton TL, Martinko T, Hale S, Fairchok MP. Prevalence and high rate of asymptomatic infection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male college reserve officer training corps cadets. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:901–4. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000091136.14932.8B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaydos CA, Howell MR, Pare B, Clark KL, Ellis DA, Hendrix RM, Gaydos JC, Mckee KT, Quinn TC. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:739–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809103391105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mertz KJ, Levine WC, Mosure DJ, Berman SM, Dorian KJ. Trends in the prevalence of chlamydial infections: the impact of community wide testing. Sex Trans Dis. 1997;24:169–75. - PubMed
    1. Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich FE, Andrilla H, Holmes KK, Stamm WE. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Eng J Med. 1996;334:1362–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms