Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;196(6):606.e1-5; discussion 606.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.019.

First-trimester combined screening: experience with an instant results approach

Affiliations

First-trimester combined screening: experience with an instant results approach

Mary E Norton et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to assess an instant results protocol for first-trimester combined screening.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of patients having first-trimester combined screening between Nov. 1, 2003 and Oct. 31, 2005. We evaluated the feasibility of patient self-collection and mail-in of blood samples before nuchal translucency ultrasound. Primary outcome was success with providing in-office, immediate screening results after the ultrasound. Predictor variables included age, ethnicity, insurance, and provider. The chi2 analysis was performed.

Results: Two thousand three hundred ten women completed first-trimester combined screening, and 60.6% received instant results. When the biochemistry sample was collected at home, 80% received instant results. Age 35 years or older predicted instant results (P = .001), whereas ethnicity, insurance, and referring provider did not. Comparing the prior 24 months, clinic volume increased by 18%. Diagnostic procedure volume was unchanged, although chorionic villus sampling increased by 12% (P = .02) and amniocentesis decreased by 6% (P = .049).

Conclusion: Patients were able to obtain instant results in 60.6% of cases, which appeared to increase the use of chorionic villus sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram illustrating results of first trimester screening program.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Malone FD, et al. First or second trimester screening for Down syndrome or both. N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 10;353(19):2001–11. - PubMed
    1. Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson JL, et al. First trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. New Engl J Med. 2003;349:1405–13. - PubMed
    1. Learman LA, Drey EA, Gates EA, Kang MS, Washington AE, Kuppermann M. Abortion attitudes of pregnant women in prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1939–45. - PubMed
    1. Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AJ, et al. First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS) J Med Screen. 2003;10(2):56–104. - PubMed
    1. Snijders RJM, Noble P, Sebire N, Souka A, Nicolaides KH. UK multicenter project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Lancet. 1998;352:343–6. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances