Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect malignancy: is it worthwhile?
- PMID: 1754856
- DOI: 10.3109/00365529108998613
Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect malignancy: is it worthwhile?
Abstract
Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect cancer is held to be mandatory. To evaluate the benefits of this routine strategy, 913 index endoscopies for gastric ulcer in 773 patients during the 3-year period 1985-87 were analyzed. Correctness of diagnosis was verified through surgery, autopsy, or clinical follow-up. Endoscopic follow-up was done in 83% of the cases, totaling 1269 endoscopies, showing gastric cancer in 10 patients. Clinical outcome, however, was poor for five of these (early death). Five additional cancer cases were missed by the endoscopic follow-up. In the same period 63 gastric cancers were found at the first endoscopy; 9 of these were diagnosed through biopsies only. Predictive values of the macroscopic judgements of benign lesion or probable/definite malignancy were 0.98 and 0.40, respectively. Evaluation of case records did not indicate characteristics that would have helped in the correct differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Thus, each case of curable gastric cancer is found at the expense of approximately 250 follow-up endoscopies. We are in need of sensitive and specific markers for possible malignancy in the patient with apparently benign gastric ulcer.
Similar articles
-
Follow-up endoscopy for benign-appearing gastric ulcers has no additive value in detecting malignancy: It is time to individualise surveillance endoscopy.Gastric Cancer. 2015 Oct;18(4):803-9. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0433-4. Epub 2014 Oct 14. Gastric Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25312052
-
Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric ulcer. Evaluation of the benefits of endoscopic follow-up observation for malignancy.Acta Chir Scand. 1985;151(1):37-41. Acta Chir Scand. 1985. PMID: 3984654
-
Accuracy of the initial endoscopic diagnosis in the discrimination of gastric ulcers: is endoscopic follow-up study always needed?J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;35(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200207000-00007. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12080222
-
[Factors associated with failure of endoscopic therapy in gastric ulcer bleeding].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Apr;26(4):227-33. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003. PMID: 12681115 Review. Spanish.
-
[A case of primary gastric plasmacytoma showing remarkable changes in endoscopic findings during five month's follow-up].Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1995 Feb;92(2):169-74. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1995. PMID: 7723171 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Follow-up endoscopy for benign-appearing gastric ulcers has no additive value in detecting malignancy: It is time to individualise surveillance endoscopy.Gastric Cancer. 2015 Oct;18(4):803-9. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0433-4. Epub 2014 Oct 14. Gastric Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25312052
-
The usefulness of ulcer size and location in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gastric ulcer.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Jan;125(1-2):21-5. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0309-8. Epub 2013 Jan 5. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23292642
-
Gastric cancer and other endoscopic diagnoses in patients with benign dyspepsia.Gut. 2000 Jan;46(1):93-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.46.1.93. Gut. 2000. PMID: 10601062 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic follow-up for all gastric ulcers to detect malignancy?Dig Dis Sci. 1994 Feb;39(2):442. doi: 10.1007/BF02090222. Dig Dis Sci. 1994. PMID: 8313832 No abstract available.
-
The distinctive gastric fluid proteome in gastric cancer reveals a multi-biomarker diagnostic profile.BMC Med Genomics. 2008 Oct 25;1:54. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-1-54. BMC Med Genomics. 2008. PMID: 18950519 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical