Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):209-15.
doi: 10.1370/afm.696.

Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices

Jesse C Crosson  1 , Pamela A Ohman-Strickland, Karissa A Hahn, Barbara DiCicco-Bloom, Eric Shaw, A John Orzano, Benjamin F Crabtree
Affiliations

Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices

Jesse C Crosson et al. Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Care of patients with diabetes requires management of complex clinical information, which may be improved by the use of an electronic medical record (EMR); however, the actual relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care quality in primary care settings is not well understood. We assessed the relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care quality in a sample of family medicine practices.

Methods: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of baseline data from 50 practices participating in a practice improvement study. Between April 2003 and December 2004 chart auditors reviewed a random sample of medical records from patients with diabetes in each practice for adherence to guidelines for diabetes processes of care, treatment, and achievement of intermediate outcomes. Practice leaders provided medical record system information. We conducted multivariate analyses of the relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care adjusting for potential practice- and patient-level confounders and practice-level clustering.

Results: Diabetes care quality in all practices showed room for improvement; however, after adjustment, patient care in the 37 practices not using an EMR was more likely to meet guidelines for process (odds ratio [OR], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-3.57) treatment (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.07-2.60), and intermediate outcomes (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.82) than in the 13 practices using an EMR.

Conclusions: The use of an EMR in primary care practices is insufficient for insuring high-quality diabetes care. Efforts to expand EMR use should focus not only on improving technology but also on developing methods for implementing and integrating this technology into practice reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm : A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 1):S3–S32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenfeld S, Bernasek C, Mendelson D. Medicare’s next voyage: encouraging physicians to adopt health information technology. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1138–1146. - PubMed
    1. Hackbarth G, Milgate K. Using quality incentives to drive physician adoption of health information technology. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1147–1149. - PubMed

Publication types