A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks
- PMID: 17548852
- PMCID: PMC1886484
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.699
A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks
Abstract
Purpose: Increasing numbers of primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are being developed in the United States to perform research relevant to everyday practice. To assess the current status and potential value of this resource, we surveyed US primary care PBRNs in operation from late 2003 to early 2004.
Methods: We performed a Web-based survey and structured interviews with PBRN directors and administrative officers, assessing PBRNs' history, size, location, organization, resources, operations, and productivity (funding obtained, studies performed, and articles published).
Results: Of 111 primary care PBRNs identified, 89 (80%) responded to the survey. The 86 (77%) meeting the criteria for primary care PBRNs contained 1,871 practices, 12,957 physicians (mean 152 per PBRN, median 100), and 14.7 million patients (mean 229,880 per PBRN, median 105,000). Minority and underinsured patients were overrepresented. The average PBRN was young (4.4 +/- 5.7 years): one-half had performed 3 or fewer studies. Three-quarters were affiliated with universities. Common research foci included prevention, diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, and mental health. Respondent PBRNs had published more than 600 articles in peer-reviewed journals. PBRNs studying questions posed by outside researchers had more federal funding (84% vs 27%, P=.006). PBRNs citing funding as a weakness relied more on local resources to fund research projects (70% vs 40%, P=.036).
Conclusions: American primary care PBRNs are mainly young, diverse, and pursuing a variety of research foci. Most have university links and provide a dynamic town-gown relationship that could be a vital national resource for improving primary care, translating research into practice, and meeting the National Institutes of Health Roadmap goals. PBRNs merit further attention from both private and public funding agencies and researchers interested in studying the delivery of primary care.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Future Directions for Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs): A CERA Survey.J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):917-923. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180069. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018. PMID: 30413547
-
Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011.J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):565-71. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120100. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012. PMID: 22956691
-
A Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) Roadmap for Evaluating COVID-19 in Community Health Centers: A Report From the OCHIN PBRN.J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):774-778. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200053. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020. PMID: 32989072 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement.Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.303. Ann Fam Med. 2005. PMID: 15928213 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Practice-Based Research Networks and Massage Therapy: a Scoping Review.Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2020 Dec 1;13(4):25-34. eCollection 2020 Dec. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2020. PMID: 33282033 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Practice-based research networks, part I: clinical laboratories to generate and translate research findings into effective patient care.J Athl Train. 2012 Sep-Oct;47(5):549-56. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.5.11. J Athl Train. 2012. PMID: 23068593 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and professional attitudes towards research in general practice: the RepR qualitative study.BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jul 21;15:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-136. BMC Fam Pract. 2014. PMID: 25047280 Free PMC article.
-
Global health delivery 2.0: using open-access technologies for transparency and operations research.PLoS Med. 2009 Dec;6(12):e1000158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000158. Epub 2009 Dec 1. PLoS Med. 2009. PMID: 19956665 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem.Ann Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;6(5):459-62. doi: 10.1370/afm.862. Ann Fam Med. 2008. PMID: 18779551 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting a Sustainable Academic-Correctional Health Partnership: Lessons for Systemic Action Research.Syst Pract Action Res. 2016 Feb 1;29(1):27-50. doi: 10.1007/s11213-015-9351-6. Epub 2015 Jun 28. Syst Pract Action Res. 2016. PMID: 26997863 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
-
- Balas E, Boren S. Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-centered Systems. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer; 2000. - PubMed
-
- The NIH Roadmap: Accelerating medical discovery to improve health. Available at: http://nihroadmap.nih.gov. Accessed: 16 October 2007. - PubMed
-
- Green LA, Fryer GE, Jr, Yawn BP, Lanier D, Dovey SM. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):2021–2025. - PubMed
-
- Schafer H. Post-approval drug research: objectives and methods. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1997;30(1 Suppl):4–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources