Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2006 Sep;50(3):172-81.

A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model

Paul A Oakley, Donald D Harrison, Deed E Harrison, Jason W Haas
Comment

A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model

Paul A Oakley et al. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006 Sep.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
“Linear” indicates the LNT Model, which is a linear extrapolation from the high dose (dose-rate) of atomic bombs dropped on Japan, drawn linearly down to zero. This model assumes that any exposure has a cancer risk, and the greater the exposure, the greater the cancer risk. “Hormesis” is the quadratic shaped curve (U-shaped curve), where between zero and the zero equivalent point (ZEP), there is less risk of cancer or a ‘benefit’. However, doses greater than the ZEP (a threshold) indicate a near linear increased risk of cancer with increasing doses. (adapted from Luckey, 1991 and Hiserodt, 2005).,
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Comment on

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bussieres AE, Ammendolia C, Peterson C, Taylor JAM. Ionizing radiation exposure – more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006;50(2):103–106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oakley PA, Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Haas JW. On “phantom risks” associated with diagnostic radiation: evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005;49(4):264–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stein F. Anatomy of Research in Allied Health. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1976, pg 45.
    1. Luckey TD. Radiation hormesis. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Boston, 1991.
    1. Hiserodt E. Underexposed: What if radiation is actually good for you? Laissez Faire Books, Little Rock, Arkansas, 2005.

LinkOut - more resources