JCCA 2006;50 (3):172-181. Oakley P, Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Haas J. A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50 year old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model (commentary)

Comment

André E Bussières et al. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006 Dec.

. 2006 Dec;50(4):285-6; author reply 286-8.

No abstract available

Comment in

A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.
Oakley PA, Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Haas JW. Oakley PA, et al. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006 Sep;50(3):172-81. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006. PMID: 17549154 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

1. Ursprung WM, Howe JW, Yochum TR, Kettner NW. Plain film radiography, pregnancy, and therapeutic abortion revisited. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2006;29(1):83–87. - PubMed
1. Oakley PA, Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Hass JW. On “phantom risks” associated with diagnostic ionizing radiation: Evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005;49(4):264–9. - PMC - PubMed
1. Bussières AE, Ammendolia C, Peterson C, Taylor JAM. Ionizing radiation exposure – more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006;50(2):103–106. - PMC - PubMed
1. Oakley P, Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Haas J. A Rebuttal to Chiropractic Radiologists’ View of the 50 year old, Linear-No-Threshold Radiation Risk Model. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006;50(3):172–181. - PMC - PubMed
1. Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Bonnin A, Le Guen B, Masse R, Monier R, Valleron AJ, de Vathaire F (2005). Dose – effect relationships and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation. Institut de France Académie des Sciences, Paris. (www.academiesciences.fr/publications/rapports/pdf/dose_effet_07_04_05_gb...)