Biomechanical effects of a lumbar support in a mattress
- PMID: 17549199
- PMCID: PMC1840018
Biomechanical effects of a lumbar support in a mattress
Abstract
For many patients with chronic low back pain, the lack of sleep and sufficient rest period that allows some relaxation is a major obstacle to a good quality of life. During sleep periods, neuromuscular activity is at a minimal level. The major factor influencing the forces on the body, and particularly the spine, is gravity. The force of gravity is sufficient to deform soft tissues when the body is resting on a mattress. Thus, the goal of this study is to measure the contact pressure forces acting on the spine with and without an inflatable support in various experimental conditions. Our hypothesis is that a lumbar support will distribute the force of gravity more uniformly over the pelvic, lumbar and thoracic areas, maintaining the lumbar lordosis, in a supine posture. In this study, 10 participants were tested when lying supine in six separate experimental conditions. These conditions varied according to the surface (no mattress, foam, mattress) and the fact that the support was inflated or not. The dependent variable measured was the contact pressure. It was measured using a pressure sensor mat (Tekscan). When the cushion was inflated the distribution of contact pressure in the different areas (pelvic, lumbar and thoracic) was modified. The comparison of the mean forces revealed that when the cushion was not inflated, the pressure distribution was mainly localized in the pelvic area. After the cushion was inflated, a significant decrease of contact pressure in the pelvic region and a significant increase in the lumbar area were observed. Our results confirm the hypothesis that a lumbar support inserted in a mattress allows a more homogenous distribution of contact pressure over the pelvic, lumbar and thoracic areas during supine posture. The use of an inflatable cushion favouring a transition of the contact pressure from the pelvic to the lumbar region could potentially limit unfavourable compressive and shearing forces acting on the lumbar spine.
Pour beaucoup de patients souffrant de lombalgies chroniques, le manque de sommeil et de périodes de repos suffisantes qui permettent une certaine détente constitue un obstacle important à une bonne qualité de vie. Pendant les périodes de sommeil, l’activité neuromusculaire est à un niveau minimal. Le principal facteur qui influence les forces s’exerçant sur le corps, et en particulier sur la colonne vertébrale, est la pesanteur. La seule force de gravité suffit à déformer les tissus mous quand le corps repose sur un matelas. Ainsi, l’objectif de cette étude est de mesurer les forces de contact agissant sur la colonne vertébrale, avec ou sans soutien gonflable, dans différentes conditions expérimentales. Notre hypothèse repose sur le fait qu’un soutien lombaire répartira la force de gravité de manière plus uniforme sur les régions pelvienne, lombaire et thoracique, maintenant la lordose lombaire en position couchée.
Cette étude a procédé à l’évaluation de 10 participants, en position couchée, dans six conditions expérimentales distinctes. Ces conditions variaient selon la surface (sans matelas, avec mousse, avec matelas) et selon que l’on dispose d’un soutien gonflable ou non. La variable dépendante mesurée était la pression de contact. Elle a été mesurée grâce à un tapis capteur de pression (Tekscan™). Quand le coussin était gonflé, la répartition de la pression de contact dans les différentes régions (pelvienne, lombaire et thoracique) était modifiée. La comparaison des forces moyennes montrait que lorsque le coussin n’était pas gonflé, la répartition de la pression était surtout localisée dans la région pelvienne. Après avoir gonflé le coussin, on observait une diminution importante de la pression de contact dans la région pelvienne et une augmentation importante dans la région lombaire. Nos résultats confirment l’hypothèse selon laquelle un soutien lombaire inséré à un matelas permet d’obtenir une répartition plus homogène de la pression de contact sur les régions pelvienne, lombaire et thoracique lorsqu’on est en position couchée. L’utilisation d’un coussin gonflable favorisant une transition de la pression de contact, de la région pelvienne à la région lombaire, serait susceptible de limiter les forces de compression et de cisaillement défavorables agissant sur la colonne lombaire.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.Spine J. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.03.012. Spine J. 2005. PMID: 16153584
-
Effectiveness of a lumbar support continuous passive motion device in the prevention of low back pain during prolonged sitting.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 1;32(23):E674-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cf3e. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17978643 Clinical Trial.
-
Can extra-articular strains be used to measure facet contact forces in the lumbar spine? An in-vitro biomechanical study.Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 Feb;222(2):171-84. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM290. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008. PMID: 18441753
-
Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;230:1-54. doi: 10.3109/17453678909154177. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989. PMID: 2658468 Review.
-
Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001;16 Suppl 1:S8-S16. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00096-6. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001. PMID: 11275338 Review.
Cited by
-
Pilot study of the impact sacroiliac joint manipulation has on walking kinematics using motion analysis technology.J Chiropr Med. 2013 Sep;12(3):143-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2013.05.001. J Chiropr Med. 2013. PMID: 24396314 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging zygapophyseal joint space changes (gapping) in low back pain patients following spinal manipulation and side-posture positioning: a randomized controlled mechanisms trial with blinding.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 May;36(4):203-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 3. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013. PMID: 23648055 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What type of mattress should be chosen to avoid back pain and improve sleep quality? Review of the literature.J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Dec 8;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00616-5. J Orthop Traumatol. 2021. PMID: 34878594 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Chemical Treatments on the Properties of High-Density Luffa Mattress Filling Materials.Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 3;12(11):1796. doi: 10.3390/ma12111796. Materials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31163588 Free PMC article.
-
Posture and firmness changes in a pressure-relieving air mattress affect cough strength in elderly people with dysphagia.PLoS One. 2018 Dec 11;13(12):e0208895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208895. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30533019 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gracovetsky SA. The resting spine. A conceptual approach to avoidance of spinal reinjury during rest. Physical Therapy. 1987;67:549–553. - PubMed
-
- Enck P, Walten T, Traue JC. Associations between back pain, quality of sleep and the quality of mattresses: double blind pilot study with hotel guest. Schmerz. 1999;13:205–207. - PubMed
-
- Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Pena A, Martin-Rodriguez JG, Sanchez-Vera M, Ferrer E, Ruano D, Guillen P, Gestoso M, Muriel A, Zamora J, Gil del Real MT, Mufraggi N. Effect of firmness of mattress on chronic non-specific low-back pain: randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2003;362:1599–1604. - PubMed
-
- Levy H, Hutton WC. Mattresses and sleep for patients with low-back pain: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons. J South Ortho Assoc. 1996;5:185–187. - PubMed
-
- Nordin M and Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system, third edition. Baltimore : Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2001, pp. 268–271, 433–434.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources