A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care
- PMID: 17549228
- PMCID: PMC1885369
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020026
A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care
Abstract
Objective: Mental health problems often affect functioning to such an extent that they result in sick leave. The worldwide reported prevalence of mental health problems in the working population is 10%-18%. In developed countries, mental health problems are one of the main grounds for receiving disability benefits. In up to 90% of cases the cause is stress-related, and health-care utilisation is mainly restricted to primary care. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of our Minimal Intervention for Stress-related mental disorders with Sick leave (MISS) in primary care, which is intended to reduce sick leave and prevent chronicity of symptoms.
Design: Cluster-randomised controlled educational trial.
Setting: Primary health-care practices in the Amsterdam area, The Netherlands.
Participants: A total of 433 patients (MISS n = 227, usual care [UC] n = 206) with sick leave and self-reported elevated level of distress.
Interventions: Forty-six primary care physicians were randomised to either receive training in the MISS or to provide UC. Eligible patients were screened by mail.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was duration of sick leave until lasting full return to work. The secondary outcomes were levels of self-reported distress, depression, anxiety, and somatisation.
Results: No superior effect of the MISS was found on duration of sick leave (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.29) nor on severity of self-reported symptoms.
Conclusions: We found no evidence that the MISS is more effective than UC in our study sample of distressed patients. Continuing research should focus on the potential beneficial effects of the MISS; we need to investigate which elements of the intervention might be useful and which elements should be adjusted to make the MISS effective.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Brouwers EPM, Tiemens BG, Terluin B, Verhaak PFM. Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sickness absence in patients with emotional distress or minor mental disorders: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:223–229. - PubMed
-
- Kessler RC, Frank RG. The impact of psychiatric disorders on work loss days. Psychol Med. 1997;27:861–873. - PubMed
-
- Wang JL, Adair CE, Patten SB. Mental health and related disability among workers: A population-based study. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49:514–522. - PubMed
-
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Economic Surveys: Netherlands. Reform of the sickness and disability benefit schemes. 2004. Available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/20/31826833.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2007.
-
- US National Mental Health Association. Mental health fast facts. 2007. http://www1.nmha.org/may/fast_facts.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2007.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
