Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;50(2):101-9.

The wait for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis

Affiliations
Free PMC article

The wait for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis

Marie-Claire Gaudet et al. Can J Surg. 2007 Apr.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: We documented the following components of waiting time for total hip replacement (THR): first surgical consultation, date of decision to operate and date of surgery. We then explored whether these intervals differed by age, sex, occupation or quality-of-life score.

Methods: We used a cross-sectional design and collected the primary data from patients 2 to 4 weeks before they underwent THR. Trained interviewers administered the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), which included data on event dates, conservative treatment, demographic information and quality of life. We illustrated waiting times, quality of life and past use of conservative treatment (i.e., cane, exercise, physiotherapy) with descriptive statistics (mean [standard deviation] or median [intraquartile range]) for continuous variables and with percentages for categorical variables. We plotted KaplanMeier graphs for each waiting time component and employed log-rank analysis to determine whether any of these delays differed by age, sex, occupation or disability. We also performed a Cox regression to adjust for all covariates simultaneously.

Results: The median wait from surgical consultation to decision to operate was 0 months. There was no difference between age, sex or occupation. The median wait from decision to operate to the date of surgery was 6 months and did not differ by age, sex or occupation. However, subjects with more severe symptoms (WOMAC) underwent surgery earlier than did those with less severe disease.

Conclusion: Although neither of the waiting time components were associated with age, sex or occupation, patients with more severe symptoms appear to be prioritized for surgery.

Objectifs: Nous avons documenté les éléments constituants suivants des temps d'attente dans le cas de l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH) : première consultation du chirurgien, date de la décision d'opérer et date de l'intervention chirurgicale. Nous avons ensuite cherché à déterminer si ces intervalles différaient selon l'âge, le sexe, l'occupation ou l'indice de la qualité de vie.

Méthodes: Nous avons utilisé un concept transversal et recueilli les données principales des patients deux à quatre semaines avant l'ATH. Des intervieweurs dûment formés ont administré la formule abrégée du questionnaire sur l'état de santé à 36 questions (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36) et l'indice Western Ontario et McMaster sur l'arthrose (WOMAC), qui comprennent des données sur les dates des événements, le traitement conservateur, les caractéristiques démographiques et la qualité de vie. Nous avons illustré les temps d'attente, la qualité de vie et le recours antérieur à un traitement conservateur (c.-à-d. canne, exercice, physiothérapie) au moyen de statistiques descriptives (moyenne [écart type] ou médiane [intervalle intraquartile]) pour les variables continues et des pourcentages pour les variables catégoriques. Nous avons tracé des courbes de Kaplan–Meier pour chaque élément constituant des temps d'attente et utilisé le test Mantel-Haenszel pour déterminer si un de ces temps différait selon l'âge, le sexe, l'occupation ou l'incapacité. Nous avons aussi procédé à une régression de Cox afin d'effectuer un rajustement pour toutes les covariables simultanément.

Résultats: Le temps d'attente médian entre la consultation du chirurgien et la décision d'opérer était de zéro mois. Il n'y avait aucune différence selon l'âge, le sexe ou l'occupation. Le temps d'attente médian entre la décision d'opérer et la date de l'intervention chirurgicale était de six mois et ne présentait aucune différence selon l'âge, le sexe ou l'occupation. Les sujets qui avaient des symptômes plus sévères (WOMAC) ont toutefois subi l'intervention chirurgicale plus rapidement que ceux dont l'état était moins grave.

Conclusion: Même si l'on n'a pas établi de lien entre aucun des éléments constituants des temps d'attente et l'âge, le sexe ou l'occupation, on a semblé accorder, pour procéder à l'intervention chirurgicale, la priorité aux patients qui avaient des symptômes plus sévères.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIG. 1. Comparison of the date patients reported deciding to have total hip replacement (X axis) and the true date of decision to operate from the medical chart. Data are from the 2 institutions where most (86.3%) of the participants had surgery.
None
FIG. 2. Kaplan–Meier curves depicting time-to-event over 5 years from surgical consultation to decision to operate for subgroups divided according to sex, age and occupation.
None
FIG. 3. Subjects were grouped by actual wait from surgical consultation to date of surgery (i.e., 28 subjects waited < 3 mo from consultation to surgery). Within each group, subjects were categorized according to what they consider a reasonable wait. Reasonable wait categories were similar across groups.
None
FIG. 4. Kaplan–Meier curves depicting time-to-event over 2 years, from the decision to operate to the date of surgery. Subgroups divided according to sex, age and occupation, as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function subscale score.

Comment in

References

    1. Pageau M, Choinière R, Ferland M, Sauvageau Y. Le portrait de santé: le Québec et ses régions. Édition 2001. Quebec: Publications du Québec; 2001.
    1. Martin RM, Sterne JA, Gunnell D, et al. NHS waiting lists and evidence of national or local failure: analysis of health service data. BMJ 2003;326:188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zelder M, Wilson G. Waiting your turn (10th ed): hospital waiting lists in Canada. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute; 2000.
    1. Badley EM. The Effect of osteoarthritis on disability and health care use in Canada. J Rheumatol Suppl 1995;43:19-22. - PubMed
    1. Badley EM, Wang PP. The contribution of arthritis and arthritis disability to nonparticipation in the labor force: a Canadian example. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1077-82. - PubMed

Publication types