Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 22;274(1621):2027-34.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0611.

The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster

Affiliations

The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster

Jenny Bangham et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host genotypes, conferring an advantage to rare host genotypes. Distinguishing between these models is empirically difficult. The maintenance of disease-resistance polymorphisms has been studied in detail in plants, but less so in animals, and rarely in natural populations. We have made a detailed study of genetic variation in host resistance in a natural animal population, Drosophila melanogaster, and its natural pathogen, the sigma virus. We confirm previous findings that a single (albeit complex) mutation in the gene ref(2)P confers resistance against sigma and show that this mutation has increased in frequency under positive selection. Previous studies suggested that ref(2)P polymorphism reflects the progress of a very recent selective sweep, and that in Europe during the 1980s, this was followed by a sweep of a sigma virus strain able to infect flies carrying this mutation. We find that the ref(2)P resistance mutation is considerably older than the recent spread of this viral strain and suggest that--possibly because it is recessive--the initial spread of the resistance mutation was very slow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean proportion of individuals infected with the sigma virus. Males and females hemizygous for the ref(2)P gene (encoding the resistant form, Gly; or the susceptible form, Asn–Gln), and males and females heterozygous for the ref(2)P gene (encoding the resistant form, Gly; or the susceptible form, Asn–Gln) are shown.

References

    1. Agrawal A, Lively C.M. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching alleles models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002;4:79–90.
    1. Andolfatto P. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001;18:279–290. - PubMed
    1. Andolfatto P, Przeworski M. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000;156:257–268. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avila A, Silverman N, Diaz-Meco M.T, Moscat J. The Drosophila atypical protein kinase C–Ref(2)P complex constitutes a conserved module for signaling in the Toll pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:8787–8795. doi:10.1128/MCB.22.24.8787-8795.2002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett J.A. The gene-for-gene hypothesis: parable or paradigm. In: Rollinson D, Anderson R.M, editors. Ecology and genetics of host–parasite interactions. Academic Press for the Linnean Society of London; London, UK: 1985. pp. 215–225.

Publication types

Associated data