Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jul 2;97(1):6-13.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603841. Epub 2007 Jun 5.

The context influences doctors' support of shared decision-making in cancer care

H L Shepherd  1 , M H N Tattersall, P N Butow
Affiliations

The context influences doctors' support of shared decision-making in cancer care

H L Shepherd et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Most cancer patients in westernised countries now want all information about their situation, good or bad, and many wish to be involved in decision-making. The attitudes to and use of shared decision-making (SDM) by cancer doctors is not well known. Australian cancer clinicians treating breast, colorectal, gynaecological, haematological, or urological cancer were surveyed to identify their usual approach to decision-making and their comfort with different decision-making styles when discussing treatment with patients. A response rate of 59% resulted in 624 complete surveys, which explored usual practice in discussing participation in decision-making, providing information, and perception of the role patients want to play. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of use of SDM. Most cancer doctors (62.4%) reported using SDM and being most comfortable with this approach. Differences were apparent between reported high comfort with SDM and less frequent usual practice. Multivariate analysis showed that specialisation in breast or urological cancers compared to other cancers (AOR 3.02), high caseload of new patients per month (AOR 2.81) and female gender (AOR 1.87) were each independently associated with increased likelihood of use of SDM. Barriers exist to the application of SDM by doctors according to clinical situation and clinician characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment decision-making examples.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson R, Funnell M, Butler P, Arnold M, Fitzgerald J, Feste C (1995) Patient empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 18: 943–949 - PubMed
    1. Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF, Sloan JA (1996) Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 19: 8–19 - PubMed
    1. Braddock III CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W (1999) Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 282: 2313–2320 - PubMed
    1. Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M (2002) Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 94: 2076–2080 - PubMed
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44: 681–692 - PubMed