Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome
- PMID: 17552962
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06911.x
Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome
Abstract
Objective: To review patients with an extended follow-up after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for calyceal diverticular stones (CDS), over a 15-year period, assessing the long-term outcome.
Patients and methods: In all, 56 patients were treated for symptomatic CDS disease by ESWL (38) or PCNL (18). The stone-bearing diverticula were in the upper calyces in 26, middle calyces in 24 and lower calyces in six patients, and in the right kidney in 22 and in the left in 34. The most frequent symptom was ipsilateral flank pain (84%) and 32% of patients presented with associated chronic urinary tract infections. In a retrospective analysis, we assessed stone size, diverticulum location, stone-free rate, symptom-free rate, complications and extended follow-up.
Results: In the short-term in the ESWL group, 21% of patients were stone-free and 61% were asymptomatic; 8% developed symptoms and 8% developed recurrence or stone-growth in the long term. There were six minor complications. In the PCNL group, 15 patients (83%) were stone-free in the short term; two had a recurrence (11%) and two had stone growth (11) in the long term. There were three complications after PCNL.
Conclusions: This series shows that PCNL is an effective and durable means of treating CDS, regardless of stone size or location of the diverticulum. Despite low stone-free rates with ESWL, most patients were rendered symptom-free with minimal complications. The long-term recurrence rates, 8% for ESWL and 11% for PCNL, were comparable.
Similar articles
-
Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 16. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19091339
-
[Open surgery of calculus of the kidney pelvis. Results and complications in the era of extracorporeal lithotripsy].Ann Urol (Paris). 1995;29(6-7):378-81. Ann Urol (Paris). 1995. PMID: 8687176 French.
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys.Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.018. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15351557
-
Long-term outcome of caliceal diverticula following percutaneous endosurgical management.J Urol. 1998 Nov;160(5):1635-9. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9783921 Review.
-
Lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary lithiasis.J Nephrol. 2000 Nov-Dec;13 Suppl 3:S71-82. J Nephrol. 2000. PMID: 11132037 Review.
Cited by
-
Percutaneous nephroscopy versus flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of calyceal diverticulum calculi: a meta-analysis.BMC Urol. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01655-w. BMC Urol. 2025. PMID: 39748346 Free PMC article.
-
Is retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy feasible for calyceal diverticular stone?Urolithiasis. 2014 Aug;42(4):347-51. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0672-1. Epub 2014 Jun 12. Urolithiasis. 2014. PMID: 24916763
-
Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of calyceal diverticular calculi.Urolithiasis. 2024 Mar 30;52(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01552-9. Urolithiasis. 2024. PMID: 38554174 Free PMC article.
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37526261 Free PMC article.
-
Calyceal diverticula: a comprehensive review.Rev Urol. 2014;16(1):29-43. Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 24791153 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources