Comparison of intracardiac cell transplantation: autologous skeletal myoblasts versus bone marrow cells

Abstract

An increasing number of patients living with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and still unacceptably high mortality created an urgent need to effectively treat and prevent disease-related events. Within the past 5 years, skeletal myoblasts (SKMBs) and bone marrow (or blood)-derived mononuclear cells (BMNCs) have demonstrated preclinical efficacy in reducing ischemia and salvaging already injured myocardium, and in preventing left ventricular (LV) remodeling, respectively. These findings have been translated into clinical trials, so far totaling over 200 patients for SKMBs and over 800 patients for BMNCs. These safety/feasibility and early phase II studies showed promising but somewhat conflicting symptomatic and functional improvements, and some safety concerns have arisen. However, the patient population, cell type, dose, time and mode of delivery, and outcome measures differed, making comparisons problematic. In addition, the mechanisms through which cells engraft and deliver their beneficial effects remain to be fully elucidated. It is now time to critically evaluate progress made and challenges encountered in order to select not only the most suitable cells for cardiac repair but also to define appropriate patient populations and outcome measures. Reiterations between bench and bedside will increase the likelihood of cell therapy success, reduce the time to development of combined of drug- and cell-based disease management algorithms, and offer these therapies to patients to achieve a greater reduction of symptoms and allow for a sustained improvement of quality of life.