Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;33(10):1740-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0712-1. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

Gastric feed intolerance is not increased in critically ill patients with type II diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Gastric feed intolerance is not increased in critically ill patients with type II diabetes mellitus

S W Lam et al. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Oct.

Erratum in

  • Intensive Care Med. 2007 Oct;33(10):1858

Abstract

Objective: To examine the occurrence of feed intolerance in critically ill patients with previously diagnosed type II diabetes mellitus (DM) who received prolonged gastric feeding.

Design and setting: Retrospective study in a level 3 mixed ICU.

Patients: All mechanically ventilated, enterally fed patients (n = 649), with (n = 118) and without type II DM (n = 531) admitted between January 2003 and July 2005.

Interventions: Patients with at least 72 h of gastric feeding were identified by review of case notes and ICU charts. The proportion that developed feed intolerance was determined. All patient received insulin therapy.

Results: The proportion of patients requiring gastric feeding for at least 72 h was similar between patients with and without DM (42%, 50/118, vs. 42%, 222/531). Data from patients with DM were also compared with a group of 50 patients matched for age, sex and APACHE II score, selected from the total non-diabetic group. The occurrence of feed intolerance (DM 52% vs. matched non-DM 50% vs. unselected non-diabetic 58%) and the time taken to develop feed intolerance (DM 62.6 +/- 43.8 h vs. matched non-DM 45.3 +/- 54.6 vs. unselected non-diabetic 50.6 +/- 59.5) were similar amongst the three groups. Feed intolerance was associated with a greater use of morphine/midazolam and vasopressor support, a lower feeding rate and a longer ICU length of stay.

Conclusions: In critically ill patients who require prolonged enteral nutrition, a prior history of DM type II does not appear to be a further risk factor for feed intolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1955-61 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3044-52 - PubMed
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991 Jul-Aug;15(4):376-83 - PubMed
    1. Diabet Med. 1996 Sep;13(9 Suppl 5):S16-22 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2334-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources