Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jun;85(6):1465-77.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.6.1465.

Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets

Julia A Ello-Martin et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Consuming foods low in energy density (kcal/g) decreases energy intake over several days, but the effectiveness of this strategy for weight loss has not been tested.

Objective: The effects on weight loss of 2 strategies for reducing the energy density of the diet were compared over 1 y.

Design: Obese women (n = 97) were randomly assigned to groups counseled either to reduce their fat intake (RF group) or to reduce their fat intake and increase their intake of water-rich foods, particularly fruit and vegetables (RF+FV group). No goals for energy or fat intake were assigned; the subjects were instructed to eat ad libitum amounts of food while following the principles of their diet.

Results: After 1 y, study completers (n = 71) in both groups had significant decreases in body weight (P < 0.0001). Subjects in the RF+FV group, however, had a significantly different pattern of weight loss (P = 0.002) than did subjects in the RF group. After 1 y, the RF+FV group lost 7.9 +/- 0.9 kg and the RF group lost 6.4 +/- 0.9 kg. Analysis of all randomly assigned subjects also showed a different pattern of weight loss between groups (P = 0.021). Diet records indicated that both groups had similar reductions in fat intake. The RF+FV group, however, had a lower dietary energy density than did the RF group (P = 0.019) as the result of consuming a greater weight of food (P = 0.025), especially fruit and vegetables (P = 0.037). The RF+FV group also reported less hunger (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: Reducing dietary energy density, particularly by combining increased fruit and vegetable intakes with decreased fat intake, is an effective strategy for managing body weight while controlling hunger.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors had any conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of subject enrollment, random assignment, and completion of the study protocol.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean (± SEM) change in body weight for study completers in the reduced-fat (RF) and reduced-fat plus increased fruit and vegetable (RF+FV) intervention groups over time. Random coefficients analysis was used to model the longitudinal response over time, with control for baseline values. The group × time interaction (P = 0.002) indicates that the response over time differed between the groups. The interaction remained significant (P = 0.021) when all randomly assigned subjects were included in the analysis. Baseline values did not differ significantly between the groups (unpaired t test).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean (± SEM) food energy density (kcal/g) for study completers in the reduced-fat (RF) and reduced-fat plus increased fruit and vegetable (RF+FV) intervention groups over time. Differences in dietary energy density between the groups were determined from a mixed linear model with repeated measures, by using all available time points and with control for baseline values. The group × time interaction was significant (P = 0.019), which indicated that dietary energy density was significantly less in the RF+FV group than in the RF group during the intervention. Baseline values did not differ significantly between the groups (unpaired t test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–55. - PubMed
    1. Makris AP, Foster GD. Dietary approaches to the treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28:117–39. viii–ix. - PubMed
    1. Elfhag K, Rossner S. Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obes Rev. 2005;6:67–85. - PubMed
    1. Pasman WJ, Saris WH, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Predictors of weight maintenance. Obes Res. 1999;7:43–50. - PubMed
    1. Cuntz U, Leibbrand R, Ehrig C, Shaw R, Fichter MM. Predictors of post-treatment weight reduction after in-patient behavioral therapy. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(suppl):S99–101. - PubMed

Publication types