Prolapse surgery: an update
- PMID: 17558265
- DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328129f522
Prolapse surgery: an update
Abstract
Purpose of review: The purpose of the review is to highlight the latest developments in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Recent findings: Total vaginal mesh has been developed with the intent to improve the outcome of pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. Two interesting papers were published in 2006. At the short follow up available, the data appear interesting, although the rate of erosions is quite high. Two American teams reported their experience in robotic surgery for the management of sacrocolpopexy and hysterectomy. The published data on the use of the da Vinci system are interesting, although they need to be reproduced and improved in other centers. A randomized controlled trial suggests the efficacy of Burch colposuspension as an antiincontinence procedure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Summary: Total vaginal mesh and robotic surgery are major innovations in the field of urogynecology. Also, Burch colposuspension has proved to be an effective antiincontinence procedure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Further studies are needed, however, with longer follow-up periods.
Similar articles
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
-
Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial.J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1007-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 17. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18639302 Clinical Trial.
-
Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Jun;61(3):173-86. Minerva Ginecol. 2009. PMID: 19415062 Review.
-
Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):729-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.010. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18971137
-
Vaginal reconstructive surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapses: a 'uterine-sparing' technique using polypropylene prostheses.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008. PMID: 18321633 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The impact of training residents on the outcome of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:289342. doi: 10.1155/2012/289342. Epub 2012 Nov 1. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012. PMID: 23209891 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for mesh erosion 3 months following vaginal reconstructive surgery using commercial kits vs. fashioned mesh-augmented vaginal repairs.Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):285-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1005-8. Epub 2009 Dec 4. Int Urogynecol J. 2010. PMID: 19960184
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study.G Chir. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):113-117. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.3.113. G Chir. 2016. PMID: 27734794 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials