Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jun-Aug;45(5):565-70.
doi: 10.1080/15563650701382730.

Comparison of bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW), methacholine, and ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water (UDCW) in patients with sulfur mustard gas-induced asthma

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW), methacholine, and ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water (UDCW) in patients with sulfur mustard gas-induced asthma

Ali Emad et al. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Jun-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate bronchial challenges using three different stimuli as screening tools for bronchial hyper-responsiveness in sulfur mustard gas-induced asthma.

Design: Randomized, cross-over clinical study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patients: Eighteen veterans with mustard gas-induced asthma and 18 normal veterans as the control group.

Intervention: Pulmonary function tests and inhalation challenges with ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW), methacholine, and ultrasonically nebulized cold water (UNDCW) were performed on all patients and subjects.

Results: Six mustard gas-induced asthmatic veterans did not respond to a 20% in FEV(1) after distilled water (13.3%), and two of them (11.11%) did not respond with distilled cold water; all responded with methacholine. Only one healthy subject developed a PC20 FEV(1) after methacholine but did not with both distilled water and distilled cold water challenges. The asthmatic patients were sensitive to distilled water with a median PD20 of 7.24 +/- 3.83 ml (range 2.54 ml to 15.83 ml), and sensitive to cold water with a median PD20 of 6.42 +/- 6.24 ml (range 1.92 ml to 25.15 ml). The median PC20 methacholine was 1.90 +/- 1.88 mg/ml (range 0.14 mg/ml to 6.20 mg/ml). In patients with a positive response to the distilled water challenge test, no significant correlation was found between PC20 of methacholine and PD20 of distilled water (Rho = -0.34, p = 0.25), whereas in patients whose responses to distilled cold water (DCW) were positive, PD20 of distilled cold water (DCW) correlated well with PC20 of methacholine (Rho = -0.69, p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Overall, the methacholine challenge test is the best method to distinguish these asthmatic patients from normal subjects in this study. When compared to the methacholine challenge, although the airway response to ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water test was somewhat less sensitive, it may be used as a simple, fast, inexpensive, and relatively reliable method to predict the absence of asthma in sulfur mustard gas-induced asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A) Comparison of responses to provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 M) and provocative dose of distilled water causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20 UNDW) values in patients with a positive response to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW). B) Comparison of PC20 M and PD20 UNDW values in patients with PC20 ≤ 6 mg/ml and PD20 UNDW ≤ 12 ml.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A) Comparison of responses to provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 M), and provocative dose of distilled cold water causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20 UNDCW) values in patients with a positive response to ultrasonically nebulized distilled cold water (UNDCW). B) Comparison of PC20 M and PD20 UNDCW values in patients with PC20 ≤ 8 mg/ml and PD20 UNDCW ≤ 12 ml.

Similar articles

References

    1. New York: Security Council of the United Nations; 1986. Reports of specialists appointed by the Secretary General to investigate allegations by the Islamic Republic of Iran concerning the use of chemical weapons. document S/16433. - PubMed
    1. Emad A, Rezaian GR. The diversity of the effects of sulfur mustard gas inhalation on respiratory system 10 years after a single, heavy exposure: Analysis of 197 cases. Chest. 1997;112:734–8. - PubMed
    1. Wormser U. Toxicology of mustard gas. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1991;12:164–7. - PubMed
    1. Calvet JH, Jarreau PH, Levame M, Ortho MP, Lorino H, Harf A, Macquin-Mavier I. Acute and chronic respiratory effects of sulfur mustard intoxication in guinea pig. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:681–8. - PubMed
    1. Chevillard M, Lainee P, Robineau P, Puchelle E. Toxic effects of sulfur mustard on respiratory epithelial cells in culture. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1992;8:171–81. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms