Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations
- PMID: 17560482
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.018
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations
Abstract
The goal of rotator cuff repairs is to achieve high initial fixation strength, minimize gap formation, maintain mechanical stability under cyclic loading, and optimize the biology of the tendon-bone interface until the cuff heals biologically to the bone. We have seen an evolution in our approaches to fixing rotator cuff tears from open to mini-open to all arthroscopic. In our arthroscopic techniques, we have also seen a change in the types of anchors and sutures we use and our repair techniques including an evolution in techniques that include single row, double row, and, most recently, transosseous equivalent fixation. Single-row repairs are least successful in restoring the footprint of the rotator cuff and are most susceptible to gap formation. Double-row repairs have an improved load to failure and minimal gap formation. Transosseous equivalent repairs have the highest ultimate load and resistance to shear and rotational forces and the lowest gap formation. This review will discuss the anatomy and biomechanics of a normal rotator cuff, the biomechanical factors that play a role in rotator cuff repairs, the initial fixation repair mechanics, and finally propose an algorithm for rotator cuff fixation based on tissue quality and tear configuration.
Similar articles
-
A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88(11):2425-31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00697. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. PMID: 17079400
-
A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71(2):128-31. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013. PMID: 24032613
-
Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1504-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314424. Epub 2008 Feb 22. Am J Sports Med. 2008. PMID: 18296541
-
Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair.Med Sport Sci. 2012;57:142-152. doi: 10.1159/000328900. Epub 2011 Oct 4. Med Sport Sci. 2012. PMID: 21986052 Review.
-
Double row repair: is it worth the hassle?Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011 Dec;19(4):342-7. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3182394215. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011. PMID: 22089283 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on tendon-bone healing in a transosseous-equivalent sheep rotator cuff model.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Feb;21(2):466-75. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1972-z. Epub 2012 Mar 31. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 22466014
-
Partial and Full-Thickness RCT: Modern Repair Techniques.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Mar;11(1):113-121. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9465-4. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018. PMID: 29356951 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a meta-analysis.JSES Int. 2020 Dec 5;5(2):254-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.007. eCollection 2021 Mar. JSES Int. 2020. PMID: 33681845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique for full thickness rotator cuff tear.Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):105-11. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.105. Epub 2010 May 4. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010. PMID: 20514268 Free PMC article.
-
The kringle suture: maximizing tendon repair stability while limiting hardware utilization-description of the technique and preliminary results.Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr;104(1):75-79. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00600-7. Epub 2019 Apr 1. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020. PMID: 30937857
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous