Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;15(11):1326-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 8.

Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative

Affiliations

Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative

F Eckstein et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Fast low angle shot (FLASH) and double echo steady state (DESS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions were recently cross-calibrated for quantification of cartilage morphology at 3T. In this pilot study for the osteoarthritis (OA) initiative we compare their test-retest-precision and sensitivity to longitudinal change.

Method: Nine participants with mild to moderate clinical OA were imaged twice each at baseline, year 1 (Y1) and year 2 (Y2). Coronal 1.5mm FLASH and sagittal 0.7mm DESS sequences were acquired; 1.5mm coronal multiplanar reformats (MPR) were obtained from the DESS. Patellar, femoral and tibial cartilage plates were quantified in a paired fashion, with blinding to time point.

Results: In the weight-bearing femorotibial joint, average precision errors across plates were 1.8% for FLASH, 2.6% for DESS, and 3.0% for MPR-DESS. Volume loss at Y1 was not significant; at Y2 the average change across the femorotibial cartilage plates was -1.7% for FLASH, -2.8% for DESS, and -0.3% for MPR-DESS. Volume change in the lateral tibia (-5.5%; P<0.03), and in the medial (-2.9%; P<0.04) and lateral femorotibial compartments (-3.8%; P<0.03) were significant for DESS.

Conclusions: FLASH, DESS and MPR-DESS all displayed adequate test-retest precision. Although the comparison between protocols is limited by the small number of participants and by the relatively small longitudinal change in cartilage morphology in this pilot study, the data suggest that significant change can be detected with MRI in a small sample of OA subjects over 2 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest statement: None of the authors has a competing interest with regard to publication of the study, because no organisation may gain or lose financially from the results of conclusions published here. Felix Eckstein works as a consultant for Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, and Virtualscopics Inc. He is CEO of Chondrometrics GmbH, a company providing MR image analysis services. Martin Hudelmaier has a part time appointment with Chondrometrics GmbH.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MR images showing a baseline (left column) and year 2 acquisitions (right column) in one of the patients studied. The images highlight the challenge in delineating the articular surfaces of the tibial and femoral cartilages in the femoro-tibial contact areas: A) coronal double oblique FLASH with water excitation (1.5mm slice thickness), B) sagittal DESS with water excitation (0.7mm slice thickness through the medial femorotibial compartment), C) coronal double oblique multiplanar reconstruction of the sagittal DESS (1.5mm slice thickness). MT = medial tibia, LT = lateral tibia, cMF = central (weight-bearing) portion of the medial femoral condyle; pMF = posterior portion of the medial femoral condyle; cLF = central (weight-bearing) portion of the lateral femoral condyle; pMF = posterior portion of the medial femoral condyle

References

    1. Peterfy CG. Imaging of the disease process. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:590–6. - PubMed
    1. Peterfy CG. Role of MR imaging in clinical research studies. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;5:365–78. - PubMed
    1. Gray ML, Eckstein F, Peterfy C, Dahlberg L, Kim YJ, Sorensen AG. Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop. 2004:S175–S181. - PubMed
    1. Peterfy CG, Gold G, Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Dardzinski B, Stevens R. MRI protocols for whole-organ assessment of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(Suppl 1):95–111. Epub;%2006 Jun 5.:95–111. - PubMed
    1. Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld JP, Waterton JC, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment . Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(Suppl 1):46–75. Epub;%2006 May;%19.:46–75. - PubMed

Publication types