Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation
- PMID: 17565488
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0994-0
Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation
Abstract
The effect of stimulus frequency on tilt and translation motion perception was studied during constant velocity off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR), and compared to the effect of stimulus frequency on eye movements. Fourteen healthy subjects were rotated in darkness about their longitudinal axis 10 degrees and 20 degrees off-vertical at 45 degrees /s (0.125 Hz) and 20 degrees off-vertical at 180 degrees /s (0.5 Hz). Perceived motion was evaluated using verbal reports and a joystick capable of recording tilt and translation in both sagittal and lateral planes. Eye movements were also recorded using videography. At the lower frequency, subjects reported the perception of progressing along the edge of a cone, whereas at the higher frequency they had the sensation of progressing along the edge of an upright cylinder. Tilt perception and ocular torsion significantly increased as the tilt angle increased from 10 degrees to 20 degrees at the lower frequency, and then decreased at the higher frequency. The phase lag of ocular torsion increased as a function of frequency, while the phase lag of tilt perception did not change. Horizontal eye movements were small at the lower frequency and showed a phase lead relative to the linear acceleration stimulus. While the phase lead of horizontal eye movements decreased at 0.5 Hz, the phase of translation perception did not vary with stimulus frequency and was similar to the phase of tilt perception during all conditions. A second data set was obtained in 12 subjects to compare motion perception phase when using a simple push-button to indicate nose-up orientation, continuous setting of pitch tilt alone, or continuous setting of tilt and translation in both pitch and roll planes as in the first data set. This set of measurements indicated that in the frequency range studied subjects tend to lead the stimulus when using a push-button task while lagging the stimulus when using a continuous setting of tilt with a joystick. Both amplitude and phase of tilt perception using the joystick were not different whether concentrating on pitch tilt alone or attempting a more complex reporting of tilt and translation in both sagittal and lateral planes. During dynamic linear stimuli in the absence of canal and visual input, a change in stimulus frequency alone elicits similar changes in the amplitude of both self-motion perception and eye movements. However, in contrast to the eye movements, the phase of both perceived tilt and translation motion is not altered by stimulus frequency over this limited range. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that neural processing to distinguish tilt and translation stimuli differs between eye movements and motion perception.
Republished in
-
Understanding vestibular function in changing gravity environments.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Jan;80(1):60-1. doi: 10.3357/asem.27000.2009. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009. PMID: 19180857 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. I. Linear acceleration responses during off-vertical axis rotation.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jun;75(6):2405-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2405. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8793753
-
Eye movements and motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation after spaceflight.J Vestib Res. 2013;23(1):13-22. doi: 10.3233/VES-130471. J Vestib Res. 2013. PMID: 23549051
-
Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. II. Inertial detection of angular velocity.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jun;75(6):2425-40. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2425. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8793754
-
Alteration of eye movements and motion perception in microgravity.Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998 Nov;28(1-2):161-72. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00036-8. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998. PMID: 9795198 Review.
-
Otolith-ocular testing in human subjects.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992 May 22;656:431-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb25227.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992. PMID: 1599161 Review.
Cited by
-
Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.J Math Biol. 2012 Dec;65(6-7):1245-66. doi: 10.1007/s00285-011-0494-5. Epub 2011 Dec 2. J Math Biol. 2012. PMID: 22134859
-
Rocking or rolling--perception of ambiguous motion after returning from space.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 29;9(10):e111107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111107. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25354042 Free PMC article.
-
Validating models of sensory conflict and perception for motion sickness prediction.Biol Cybern. 2023 Jun;117(3):185-209. doi: 10.1007/s00422-023-00959-8. Epub 2023 Mar 27. Biol Cybern. 2023. PMID: 36971844 Free PMC article.
-
Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.J Vestib Res. 2012 Jan 1;22(2):81-94. doi: 10.3233/VES-2012-0441. J Vestib Res. 2012. PMID: 23000608 Free PMC article.
-
Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs.J Vestib Res. 2008;18(4):171-86. J Vestib Res. 2008. PMID: 19208962 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical