Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers
- PMID: 17565691
- PMCID: PMC1899487
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-84
Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers
Abstract
Background: In recent years, decision makers in Canada and elsewhere have expressed a desire for more explicit, evidence-based approaches to priority setting. To achieve this aim within health care organizations, knowledge of both the organizational context and stakeholder attitudes towards priority setting are required. The current work adds to a limited yet growing body of international literature describing priority setting practices in health organizations.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using in-depth, face-to-face interviews with 25 key decision makers of the Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) of British Columbia. Major themes and sub-themes were identified through content analysis.
Results: Priorities were described by decision makers as being set in an ad hoc manner, with resources generally allocated along historical lines. Participants identified the Strategic Plan and a strong research base as strengths of the organization. The main areas for improvement were a desire to have a more transparent process for priority setting, a need to develop a culture which supports explicit priority setting, and a focus on fairness in decision making. Barriers to an explicit allocation process included the challenge of providing specialized services for disparate patient groups, and a lack of formal training in priority setting amongst decision makers.
Conclusion: This study identified factors important to understanding organizational context and informed next steps for explicit priority setting for a provincial health authority. While the PHSA is unique in its organizational structure in Canada, lessons about priority setting should be transferable to other contexts.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evidence-based priority-setting: what do the decision-makers think?J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jul;9(3):146-52. doi: 10.1258/1355819041403240. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004. PMID: 15272972
-
From the trenches: views from decision-makers on health services priority setting.Health Serv Manage Res. 2005 May;18(2):100-8. doi: 10.1258/0951484053723117. Health Serv Manage Res. 2005. PMID: 15901420
-
Changing priority setting practice: the role of implementation in practice change.Health Policy. 2014 Aug;117(2):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 27. Health Policy. 2014. PMID: 24815208
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature.Health Policy. 2017 Sep;121(9):937-946. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 12. Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 28734682 Review.
Cited by
-
Lessons learned from Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Nutrition & Health (EVIDENT) in Africa: a project evaluation.Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 31;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0413-6. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019. PMID: 30704528 Free PMC article.
-
Decision maker views on priority setting in the Vancouver Island Health Authority.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2008 Jul 21;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-6-13. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2008. PMID: 18644152 Free PMC article.
-
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 5;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-43. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. PMID: 19265518 Free PMC article.
-
Moral Distress among Healthcare Managers: Conditions, Consequences and Potential Responses.Healthc Policy. 2010 Nov;6(2):99-112. Healthc Policy. 2010. PMID: 22043226 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing and Improving Performance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in a Canadian Health Region.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):328-335. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.98. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018. PMID: 29626400 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mitton C, Donaldson C. Priority Setting Toolkit: A guide to the use of economics in healthcare decision making. London, BMJ Publishing Group; 2004. p. 183.
-
- Vale L. Programme Budgeting: Key Decision Makers Survey. Aberdeen, Grampian Health Board; 1996.
-
- Miller P. Managing informed purchasing: a survey of decision makers. J Managed Med. 1997;11:35–42. - PubMed
-
- Mitton C, Prout S. Setting priorities in the south west of Western Australia: where are we now? Aust Health Rev. 2004;28:301–310. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources